Christian Party

 

Forum

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Wiki

Beerhouse

Blog

Feedback

dna

RCC

AIDS

Home

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

TRAITORS

Medicine?

 

Asians are approximately as unlikely to be police as women in general.

 



Compliments of chink Hu

Police

@@police

  also see -affirmative-action.police



  Summary:



  Issue - if blacks are equal or nearly so to local population, should

  they be entiled to racial preferences even if population quota is

  met?



  Asians consistently least represented race, with Hispanics close

  behind. Blacks are nearly always within a factor of two, and often

  very close to parity, especially in California.





  d:\doc\94\17\citycop.wk1 Asians least represented of all races, but

  best in Seattle



Police Representation by Race

Ranked by Asian Representation

------------------------------------------------------------------

         Index vs. Whi   White    Black    Hispanic Asian    W-Avg

         Seattle(1)  WA   1.00     1.33     2.12     1.01     0.90

         Seattle     WA   1.00    -1.29    -1.53    -1.69     1.10

         USA total        1.00    -1.16    -1.77    -3.0

         Ventura     CA   1.00     1.1     -2.2     -3.3 

         San Jose    CA   1.00    -1.35    -1.53    -3.41     1.29

         Los Angeles CA   1.00    -1.49    -2.88    -4.24     1.61

         San Francisco CA 1.00    -1.71    -2.04    -4.82     1.53

         San Diego   CA   1.00    -1.68    -2.39    -5.27     1.34

         Dade County FL   1.00    -2.32    -2.94    -5.57     1.86

         Chicago     IL   1.00    -2.80    -4.66   -13.21     1.78

         New York    NY   1.00    -3.83    -2.41   -23.20     1.63

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Index White=1.00 -2.00=1/2  

W-Avg is white police divided by population



Seattle is closest to white for all races compared to other cities.

Blacks are within 30%, and Asians are within a factor of 2. Seattle

appears to be the only city where Asian police applicant are equal to

whites in representation. New York has the lowest rate of Asian

participation, despite relatively large Asian population.



(1) - 1995 Seattle Police applicants





%%statistics



\doc\96\04\lapdrace.wk1

Composition of Los Angeles Police and Sheriff Department

        Percent                 Index

        Sheriff Police  1990 popSheriff Police

Male       86.8%   83.0%   50.0%   -1.07    1.18

Female     13.1%   17.0%   50.0%   -7.06   -4.13

White      69.0%   52.4%   37.3%    1.85    1.40

Black       9.2%   14.5%   13.0%   -2.61   -1.26

Hispanic   18.9%   27.7%   39.9%   -3.91   -2.02

Asian       2.2%    4.0%    9.2%   -7.74   -3.23



Sheriff - Feb 96 Police Dec 95



Source: "Success of Reforms at LAPD, Sheriff's Dept" Jim Newman

Los Angeles Times March 10, 1996 p. A1

Comment - At 1/8 and 1/3, Asians are approximately as unlikely to be

police as women in general.



        Percent Index

        Sheriff Sheriff

White      69.0%    1.85

Male       86.8%   -1.07

Black       9.2%   -2.61

Hispanic   18.9%   -3.91

Female     13.1%   -7.06

Asian       2.2%   -7.74





\doc\96\03\polrace.wk1 US FBI survey of police departments nationally:



Asians are by far the least likely to be police officers, Blacks are nearly at parity, 

Black women are far over parity with white women.

Blacks are 12-18% of large city police forces.

US overall  W1.00 B-1.16 H-1.77 A-3.0

women US W1.00 B2.37 H-1.10 A-3.24

*A includes native American



Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics "Local Police Departments 1993"

Brian A. Reaves Ph.D.  U.S. Department of Justice April 1996,

NCJ-148822 http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/



Percentage within Gender

                                White                   Black

                                Total   Men     Women   Total   Men     Women

Population served                  73.8%   73.8%   73.8%   12.0%   12.0%   12.0%

All-sizes                 100.0%   81.0%   82.5%   65.5%   11.3%   10.0%   25.3%

1,000,000-or-more         100.0%   68.3%   74.7%   51.4%   17.5%   13.6%   33.3%

500,000-999,999           100.0%   66.1%   68.5%   49.6%   21.0%   18.4%   39.8%

250,000-499,999           100.0%   73.8%   73.0%   62.8%   18.1%   16.2%   28.1%

100,000-249,999           100.0%   81.3%   81.6%   71.1%   12.6%   11.3%   23.3%

50,000-99,999             100.0%   86.3%   86.8%   78.6%    7.2%    6.8%   12.9%

25,000-49,999             100.0%   90.2%   89.8%   86.8%    5.4%    5.3%    9.4%

10,000-24,999             100.0%   91.6%   91.7%   91.8%    5.1%    5.1%    6.1%

2,500-9,999               100.0%   92.8%   93.0%   90.7%    4.1%    4.0%    7.0%

Under 2500                100.0%   91.7%   91.9%   82.1%    5.3%    5.1%   10.7%



                                Hispanic                Other

                                Total   Men     Women   Total   Men     Women

Population served                  10.0%   10.0%   10.0%    4.2%    4.2%    4.2%

All-sizes                           6.2%    6.0%    8.0%    1.5%    1.5%    1.1%

1,000,000-or-more                  11.8%   10.6%   13.9%    1.2%    1.1%    1.4%

500,000-999,999                     7.0%    7.0%    7.3%    5.8%    6.2%    3.3%

250,000-499,999                     9.3%    9.3%    7.4%    1.4%    1.4%    1.7%

100,000-249,999                     5.4%    5.4%    4.4%    1.6%    1.6%    1.1%

50,000-99,999                       5.1%    5.1%    7.1%    1.4%    1.4%    1.4%

25,000-49,999                       4.3%    4.3%    3.8%    0.6%    0.6%    0.0%

10,000-24,999                       2.6%    2.6%    2.0%    0.6%    0.6%    0.0%

2,500-9,999                         2.6%    2.5%    2.3%    0.5%    0.5%    0.0%

Under 2500                          1.9%    1.9%    3.6%    1.2%    1.1%    3.6%











Index Vs. National Population White vs. population, Others vs. White=1.00

Percentage within Gender

                                White                   Black

                                Total   Men     Women   Total   Men     Women

Population served                  73.8%   73.8%   73.8%   12.0%   12.0%   12.0%

All-sizes                 100.0%    1.10    1.12    0.89   -1.17   -1.35    2.37

1,000,000-or-more         100.0%    0.93    1.01    0.70    1.58    1.12    3.99

500,000-999,999           100.0%    0.90    0.93    0.67    1.95    1.65    4.94

250,000-499,999           100.0%    1.00    0.99    0.85    1.51    1.37    2.75

100,000-249,999           100.0%    1.10    1.11    0.96   -1.05   -1.17    2.02

50,000-99,999             100.0%    1.17    1.18    1.06   -1.95   -2.08    1.01

25,000-49,999             100.0%    1.22    1.22    1.18   -2.72   -2.78   -1.50

10,000-24,999             100.0%    1.24    1.24    1.24   -2.92   -2.95   -2.44

2,500-9,999               100.0%    1.26    1.26    1.23   -3.68   -3.80   -2.11

Under 2500                100.0%    1.24    1.24    1.11   -2.81   -2.90   -1.25



                                Hispanic                Other

                                Total   Men     Women   Total   Men     Women

Population served                   0.10    0.10    0.10    0.04    0.04    0.04

All-sizes                          -1.77   -1.86   -1.10   -3.07   -3.06   -3.24

1,000,000-or-more                   1.28    1.05    1.99   -3.24   -3.93   -2.11

500,000-999,999                    -1.28   -1.33    1.09    1.54    1.58    1.15

250,000-499,999                    -1.08   -1.07   -1.14   -3.00   -2.89   -2.16

100,000-249,999                    -2.04   -2.03   -2.17   -2.89   -2.85   -3.64

50,000-99,999                      -2.29   -2.33   -1.49   -3.51   -3.53   -3.13

25,000-49,999                      -2.84   -2.83   -3.12   -8.56   -8.11#DIV/0!

10,000-24,999                      -4.77   -4.72   -6.10   -8.69   -8.26#DIV/0!

2,500-9,999                        -4.84   -5.02   -5.28  -10.56  -10.12#DIV/0!

Under 2500                         -6.54   -6.72   -3.12   -4.35   -4.62   -1.31





 \doc\95\04\miampoli.wk1 - Miami police

            White    Black    Hisp     Asian/Oth

 Total        1.86    -2.32    -2.94    -5.57

 Leadership   2.46    -4.73    -5.80   #DIV/0!

 Black women are no less represented than white women

 Asians are the least represented.

 Black and Hispanic men are not under-represented



d:\doc\94\18\chicpol2.wk1 - Chicago Police Exam

source: Chicago police department phone call



Asians only slightly under-represented among applicants, but 1/4,

just as low as Blacks in sargeant's exam after passing, despite

higher pass rate because of 1/3 at applicant level. Asian pass rate in

officer exam is close, but only 1/2 at sargeant level.



Top 500 Sargeants Pass Rate W1.0(16.4%) B-6.10 H-3.74 A/Other -2.29

Officer Pass Rate W1.0(45.2%) B-1.52 H-1.58 A-1.32



Vs Population White = 1.0               

Sargeant's Examination              



            White   Black  Hispanic As/Other

Applied     1.49    -1.22   -1.83   -2.94

Passed      1.98    -2.49   -2.36   -2.95

Top 500     2.29    -4.83   -4.45   -4.38



Officer test                

Applied     1.13    -1.08   -1.07   -1.13

Well Qual   1.41    -1.31   -1.36   -1.20



  d:\doc\94\17\priv\chicpoli.txt - Chicago police test

  1987 W71 B22.5 H5.2 O0.4

  1994 W65 B25   H8.3 O1.7

  Among top 500 in sargeants test, 8% black, 4.4% hispanic

  rate H-2 B-3 Not off by THAT much...





  doc921\sjpolice.xl* san jose police 

     W1.3 B-1.3 H-1.5 A-3.4 NA 2.2



  doc922\ventcop.wk1 Ventura Sherrif has enough blacks 

     B1.1 H-2.2 A-3.3 O-4



  doc932x doc937\lapolice.xls Los Angeles police breaksdown - enough blacks,

   more black women than white women! 

   Men   B-1.2        H-2.4 A-4.5

   Women B 1.3 NA1.1  H-2.1 A-4.2



  doc\94\15\priv\nypolice.txt NYTimes police survey - no mention of

Asians NYC 29%B pop vs. 11.6% police Chicago = 39/25 Los Angeles = 14

/ 14 PARITY Department of Justice 1992 Sourcebook has chart on p. 47 



    NYC         0.40

    Los Angeles 1.00

    San Jose    0.85

    Oakland     0.60



%%chief



\PRIV\96\13\ASPOLCHF.HTM San Francisco Chronicle Tuesday, January 9,

1996 � Page A11 "New S.F. Police Chief Is Widely Respected First

Asian American to head force " Summary: Mayor Willie Brown selects

Fred Lau as 1st Asian American police Chief.  Susan Sward, Chronicle

Staff Writer 





%%testing



Asians do slightly worse in Chicago police test, much

worse in 1994 written Seattle police test, and 

spectacularly worse, even worse than blacks on the

1995 video test.





Summary

-----------------------------------------------------

Chicago 1994              W1.00 B-1.11 H-1.05 A-1.03

Seattle 1994 Writ Police  W1.00 B-4.65 H-2.37 A-2.76

Seattle 1995 Vid  Police  W1.00 B-5.42 H-1.85 A-5.86



-------------------------------------------------

[[Chicago



\doc\94\17\priv\coptest3.txt - Chicago controversy over police test

  Chicago Tribune 7/27/94



 % right on 150 multiple choice problems

 W 67   B 60 H63 A65 AI 65

Chicago 1994  W1.00 B-1.11 H-1.05 A -1.03



----------------------------------------------------------------



[[Denver



\doc\97\01\blaknews.txt Newsweek May 6, 1991 p. 31 Mark Whitaker et

al F020397-1 In Denver, police and fire departments didn't lower

standards for test scores, they started to tutor blacks, and their

scores improved dramatically.



---------------------------------------

[[Seattle



\doc\95\10\testdist.wk1

Print out of table

\doc\95\11\badtest.doc

\doc\95\10\testdist.wk1



Analysis by Arthur Hu July 18, 1995



Test Score Distribution Comparison -

New Seattle Video Police Test vs. CLAS and SAT



          1995   1994Calf Math G10US Math G12

        Seattle PolicCLAS (1994)  SAT (1993)    Fail    Pass

        Video Written    35     93    35      93IncreaseReduce

White     34.5   93.2    35     93    35      93   9.63   2.70

Black      8.8   74.8     9     86     8      75   3.62   8.50

Hisp      22.2   85.3    12     87    14      88   5.29   3.84

Asian      8.2   83.3    46     94    48      95   5.50  10.16

Fail increase is increase in percent failures from 1994 to 1995 police test

Pass reduce shows white passing down by 1/3, blacks by 1/9



Pass / Fail Ratio

White   0.526713.70590.538513.28570.5384613.2857



Index White = 1.00  -2.00 = 1/2

White    1.00   1.00  1.00   1.00   1.00   1.00

Black   -5.46  -4.62 -5.44  -2.16  -6.19  -4.43

Hisp    -1.85  -2.36 -3.95  -1.99  -3.31  -1.81

Asian   -5.90  -2.75  1.58   1.18   1.71   1.43



Pass rates for Seattle Police Exams, May 1994 written and March 1995 video

test based on 70% correct. Equivalent distributions for CLAS and SAT tests are

for math tests based on 35% and 93% pass rates for whites, compared to

equivalent percentage of minorities who achieved the same score. Pass / Fail

ratio index shows that regardless of whether a test passes 35 percent or 93

percent of whites, the pass / fail ratio remains between 4 and 6 times better for

whites than blacks.



The only other known standardized test where Asians score as poorly as

African Americans is the National Literacy test, which is very culture dependent.



Sources: California Department of Education, College Board Seattle Public

Safety Civil Service Commision "Police Video Exam Stirs Ire" Seattle Post

Intelligencer July 17, 1995 p. 1

March 1995 Video Exam

                     Pass  Pass   Pct of Pct of Pct     Pop Index

Group   TestedPassed Rate  Index  Tested Pass   Pop     Tested Pass

White      695    240 34.5%  1.00   66.4%  83.6%   73.7%  1.00 1.00

Black      124     11  8.9% -3.89   11.9%   3.8%    9.9%  1.33 -2.93

Asian      109      9  8.3% -4.18   10.4%   3.1%   11.5%  1.01 -4.16

Hispanic    72     16 22.2% -1.55    6.9%   5.6%    3.6%  2.12 1.36

AmInd       23      7 30.4% -1.13    2.2%   2.4%    1.3%  1.88 1.65

UnSpec      23      4 17.4% -1.99    2.2%   1.4%        White vs. pop

Total     1046    287 27.4% -1.26  100.0% 100.0%          0.90 1.13

Index 1.00 = white rate 2.00 = twice -2.00 = half       ^ Note that every minority is

                                                        equal or better represented

Men        848    249 29.4%  1.00                       than whites among applicants

Women      188     38 20.2% -1.45

Index 1.00 = male rate 2.00 = twice -2.00 = half



May 1994 Written Exam

                     Pass  Pass   Pct of Pct of Pct     Pop Index

Group   TestedPassed Rate  Index  Tested Pass   Pop     Tested Pass

White      784    731 93.2%  1.00   75.0% 254.7%   73.7%  1.13 3.05

Black      119     89 74.8% -1.25   11.4%  31.0%    9.9%  1.27 2.76

Asian       96     80 83.3% -1.12    9.2%  27.9%   11.5% -1.13 2.14

Hispanic    75     64 85.3% -1.09    7.2%  22.3%    3.6%  2.21 5.46

AmInd       24     18 75.0% -1.24    2.3%   6.3%    1.3%  1.96 4.25

UnSpec      35     19 54.3% -1.72    3.3%   6.6%        White vs. pop

Total     1133   1011 89.2% -1.04  108.3% 352.3%          1.02 3.46

Index 1.00 = white rate 2.00 = twice -2.00 = half



Men        960    854 89.0%  1.00

Women      173    157 90.8% -0.98

Index 1.00 = male rate 2.00 = twice -2.00 = half



Ranked by 1995 Pass / Fail Index         Ranked by 1995

        1995 Video Te1994 Written Test   Probability of Application

        Pass  P/F    Pass  P/F

Group   Rate  Index  Rate  Index                   1995    1994

White    34.5%  1.00  93.2%  1.00        Hispani   2.12   2.21

AmInd    30.4% -1.21  75.0% -4.60        AmInd     1.88   1.96

Total    27.4%  -1.39 89.2% -1.66        Black     1.33   1.27

Hispanic 22.2% -1.85  85.3% -2.37        Asian     1.01  -1.13

UnSpec   17.4%  -2.51 54.3%-11.61        White     1.00   1.13

Black     8.9% -5.42  74.8% -4.65        Total     0.90   1.02

Asian     8.3% -5.86  83.3% -2.76



Asians pass the Video test at the lowest rate, they passed the old written

test at the same rate as Hispanics.



In contrast with many other cities, by 1995, no minorities were under-represented in

the testing / applicant pool, although Asians were the least represented minority

in a field Asians historically have avoided. Hispanics are also the most under-

represented group in California, but not in Seattle.





          1995                1994

        P / f Index        P/F    Index

Group

White    0.53   1.00        13.79   1.00

Black    0.10  -5.42         2.97  -4.65

Asian    0.09  -5.86         5.00  -2.76

Hispanic 0.29  -1.85         5.82  -2.37

AmInd    0.44  -1.21         3.00  -4.60

UnSpec   0.21  -2.51         1.19 -11.61

Total    0.38  -1.39         8.29  -1.66



Seattle 1994 Writ Police  W1.00 B-4.65 H-2.37 A-2.76

Seattle 1995 Vid  Police  W1.00 B-5.42 H-1.85 A-5.86



7/14/95 An Anti Asian Police Test?

Seattle's police department changes from a written to a video

test, but minorities flunk at even higher rates, and this is the

only test in history were Asians score poorer than Hispanics or

African Americans.





Modified Friday, July 04, 2008

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party