Equality

Christian Party

From "Equality" to Totalitarianism

"In order to build a great socialist society it is of the utmost importance to arouse the broad masses of women to join in productive activity. Men and women must receive equal pay for equal work in production. Genuine equality between the sexes can only be realized in the process of the socialist transformation of society as a whole."

Mao Tse-Tung, the grandest feminist of them all, on equality in the introductory note to "Women Have Gone to the Labour Front" (1955), The Socialist Upsurge in China's Countryside, Chinese ed., Vol. I.With those simple words, Mao set a billion Chinese off on a course which placed them easily within reach of "equality" today. Chinese monthly incomes are now $30 per worker, and genuine "equality" can be achieved by reducing their incomes a mere $30 per month more--to ground zero. But Mao wasn't the first, and he won't be the last, to destroy cultures, violate millennia of successful religious growth, and plunge world economies into chaos.

"Again, the license of the Lacedaemonian women defeats the intention of the Spartan constitution, and is adverse to the happiness of the state."

Aristotle wrote this in Politics 2,350 years ago, showing that "equality" is nothing new--that man has known since the Parthenon was built how to destroy cultures and nations with promises of "equality". It's always the best and fastest way to tear up a Constitution.

"The Russian man hasn't been able earn enough to feed his family ever since women got 'equality' [read: Bolshevism in 1917]."

Russian translator Sviete Allar in Moscow, May 12, 1992 noted that Russia established "equality" in 1917 and has been on a faster downhill track, and thus is even closer to "equality", than China. Russian incomes are already at $10 per month and still plunging rapidly. Equality is also achievable in Russia--at ground zero. Contrast such thinking to our Forefathers who inspired the US Constitition:

"Were our State a pure democracy . . . there would yet be excluded from their deliberations . . . women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, should not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men." Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval (Sept. 5, 1816), in 10 Writings of Thomas Jefferson 45-46, n. 1 (P. Ford ed. 1899).

With those simple words, Thomas Jefferson placed this country on a completely contradictory course to Russia and China for almost two centuries, establishing free enterprise principles which awarded workers based on their contributions to productivity, not based on a minority or gender or race or victimhood status. It established by 1965 the highest standard of living the world had ever known, making the US Constitution in combination with the Holy Bible one of the greatest success stories in recorded history. But ALLL of that was destroyed by Justice Douglas in 1971 when the term "equal protection" was applied to women for the first time since the Constitution was drafted, contrary to centuries of case law to the contrary, in violation of the will of we the people, and in violation of the principles of the First Amendment right to free exercise of religion:

. . "WE MUST THEREFORE CONCLUDE THAT ITS FRAMERS UNDERSTOOD THEIR AMENDMENT TO BE A BROADLY WORDED INJUNCTION CAPABLE OF BEING INTERPRETED BY FUTURE GENERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE VISION AND NEEDS OF THOSE GENERATIONS"

Justice Douglas did nothing less than violate the most funadmental religious principles of the 85% of North Americans who are Christians in a futile attempt to destroy American culture. Did he know then that any government which promises to enforce "equality" is warning its citizens that centuries of social, economic, and spiritual progress just came to a screeching halt, that they would all be living in a totalitarian state within thirty years? Did he too want to prove to the world that "equality" could be achieved at the same place that it will be achieved in Russia and China--at zero incomes? British Conservative George Walden answers the question:

"A country losing touch with its own history is like an old man losing his glasses, a distressing sight, at once vulnerable, unsure, and easily disoriented."

Christian Americans are a bit different, though, George. They will forever live by the scriptures of the Holy Bible and not by the words of some moral minor sitting on the U.S. Supreme Court:

To the woman he said, "I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.", Genesis 3:16

THE GENDER GAP

The Gender gap hit new records. Had women not voted, Bob Dole
would be president today, just as George Bush won the majority of
the male vote in 1992. But women so disproportionately voted in
favor of Bill Clinton that he won by a good margin. Among single
women, the Clinton lead was 44 points!

When men look at Bill Clinton, they see an immature
adolescent with a bad character. When women look at Bill Clinton,
they see a handsome man who cares and who tries so hard.

It's way past time to fire the moral minors who are incapable of comprehending the value of individual merit as described in the Holy Bible.

slam[1].gif (3957 bytes)