![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Percent of PopulationCommits Half the Homicides
The Mongrelization of America Increased Our Homicide Rate Ten Fold BLACKS KILL 180,000 WHITES IN UNPUBLICIZED MASS CARNAGE Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks The media-suppressed Wichita massacre Only
1,399 The ACTUAL US homicide rate may be FOUR TIMES GREATER (23.4 vs. 6.1 homicides per 100,000 population) than the FBI estimates The FBI estimates there were 806,316 homicides in the US between 1965 and 2004, of which 588,611 were committed by blacks, of which 179,808 were Whites murdered by blacks. Of the estimated 806,316 homicides, 322,526 were not cleared, only 483,790 were cleared, and of those 179,808 Whites murdered by blacks, 43,541 were cleared and 136,267 were not cleared. In four short decades, American blacks killed almost as many Whites as were killed in WWII, four times as many Whites as were killed in Vietnam, and 60 times as many Whites as died in 911 or Iraq Had our murder rate been equivalent to Saudi Arabia's rate of only 0.4 homicides per 100,000 population, the US would have had only 44,800 murders, saving 761,516 American lives in just four decades In addition, American blacks are directly responsible for 30,000 ADDITIONAL traffic fatalities EACH YEAR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1991 Homicides |
Homicide Rate per 100,000 population |
Number of Homicides in 1991 |
|
Singapore |
0.1 |
3 |
|
N. Dakota |
0.2 |
1 |
| Saudi Arabia | 0.4 | 79 |
|
US Israelites |
0.7 |
1,337 |
|
Ireland |
1.2 |
44 |
|
US 1900 |
1.2 |
913 |
|
China |
1.3 |
14,514 |
|
India |
3.8 |
37,277 |
|
Madagascar |
4.3 |
629 |
|
South Africa |
6.6 |
3,041 |
|
Russia |
8.1 |
11,832 |
|
US FBI estimate |
10.5 |
26,749 |
| US calculated | 23.4 | 59,612 |
|
US mamzers |
39.1 |
25,412 |
|
US blacks |
52.0 |
15,600 |
|
Detroit, Mi. |
59 |
708 |
|
Gary, IN |
79.4 |
93 |
|
Wash, DC |
80.6 |
487 |
|
New Orleans, La. |
85.8 |
479 |

Your quality of life can be easily calculated by just knowing the percentage of the population in your community, county, city, or state who are Blacks and Mexicans. With the Niggerizertm, you can easily determine to within 5% what to expect the homicide rate and education quality in your community to be. For example, if you lived in Washington, DC, and knew that 61.4% of the population of 572,000 Washingtonians were Blacks, the Niggerizertm would tell you to expect there to be 239 homicides per year. This is a homicide rate of 41.8 per 100,000 population, precisely that reported on Table No. 285 in the 2002 US Statistical Abstract.
Conversely, if you lived in a rural state like New Mexico and wondered why it is that you were 12 times more likely to be a homicide victim than a resident of a rural state like North Dakota, even though there are few Blacks in either state, the Niggerizertm will easily provide the answer. Once you know that only 2.6% of the 1,819,000 New Mexicans are Blacks, but that 22.5% of them are Mexicans, you can use the Niggerizertm to calculate that there will be 134 homicide victims in New Mexico each year. Go to Table No. 285 of the 2002 US Statistical Abstract to confirm that this homicide rate of 7.4 is correct. Be careful not to include Other Hispanic in your estimate for the percent of New Mexico residents who are Mexicans.
If you're a Washingtonian who has been wondering which story from media and politicians to believe about why your homicide rate was 47% higher a decade ago, forget all of the absurd claims about their needing more of your tax dollars and note only that the percentage of Washingtonians who are Blacks was also 47% higher then. With a population then which was 90% Blacks, you can use the Niggerizertm to calculate that the homicide rate then should have been 61.4, precisely as reported on Table No. 132 of the 1996 US Statistical Abstract.
MOST BLACK MURDERERS NEVER BROUGHT TO JUSTICE
To add insult to injury, after four decades of affirmative action, the clearance rate of homicides in the US plunged from 94% to 63%, leaving us with 250,000 murderers who were never arrested, making us the only industrialized nation with twice as many murderers roaming free than there are homicides annually in the entire world. The low incarceration rate of mamzers relative to the rate at which they commit crimes is proof that the majority of murderers who were never brought to justice are mamzers.
Leaving them free to murder, again and again, is an act of sheer genocide.
A comparison of homicide rates by race reveals that it's almost exclusively homicides perpetrated by Blacks, Mexicans, and Puerto Ricans which were never "cleared". Of the 17,261 homicides committed by Blacks in 1993, 8,584 or half of them were never cleared, and of the 6,000 homicides committed by Mexicans/Puerto Ricans, 1,200 or 20% of them were never cleared. The total number of homicides committed by Other Hispanics and Whites which were never cleared was 501, less than 5% of all the homicides which were never cleared.
1993 Homicides |
% Pop |
Pop |
Homicide rate |
Homicides |
Cleared |
Not Cleared |
Percent Total Homicides |
Percent of Cleared |
Percent of Not Cleared |
Blacks |
12.5% |
32.1 |
53.73 |
17,261 |
8,677 |
8,584 |
66.4% |
55.2% |
83.5% |
Mexicans/Puerto Ricans |
7.9% |
20.3 |
29.55 |
6,000 |
4,800 |
1,200 |
23.1% |
30.5% |
11.7% |
Other Hispanics |
3.6% |
9.3 |
10.00 |
925 |
740 |
185 |
3.6% |
4.7% |
1.8% |
Whites |
71.0% |
182.5 |
1.00 |
1,825 |
1,509 |
316 |
7.0% |
9.6% |
3.1% |
95.0% |
244.2 |
94.28 |
26,011 |
15,718 |
10,284 |
60.4% |
39.5% |


EACH NEW GUN CONTROL LAW KILLED 25 AMERICANS
The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that the homicide rate between 1957, before the very first gun control law was ever conceived of, was 4 per 100,000 population, and that by 1991, following the passage of more than 22,000 ill-conceived gun control laws, it had almost tripled, to 9.8. This represents a 3.1 fold increase in the number of homicides, from 8,060 to24,700, and other BJS sources report that the rate in 1980 was 10.7, or 2.7 times higher than the pre-gun-control rate. The US Statistical Abstract reports the rate for men between the ages of 25 and 44 to be 21.7 (Table 130), for black males between 15 to 24 to be 157.6 (Table 131), and for New York and Washington, DC, for all races and ages, to be 11.3 and 61.4, respectively (Table 132). These are all record high homicide rates, with the average in 1991 being 9 times higher than the US rate in 1903, 2.5 times higher than the world average, ten times higher than the current rates in Denmark, Hong Kong, Israel, Ireland, or Poland, and 20 times higher than Cyprus, England/Wales, the Slovak Republic, and Singapore.
Had the downward trend in the US which had begun in 1933 merely continued, rather than suddenly reversing in 1960 and almost tripling by 1991, the homicide rate in the US in 2000 would have been lower than 1.4, equivalent to China, much lower than France, but still 2-3 times higher than England. This simple reversal of an encouraging long term trend is responsible for an extra 550,000 homicides in the US, and it's the gun lobbyists who are the prime murder suspects.

Men like John Lott warned these gun lobbyists that outlawing guns would increase crime years ago. The fact that 22,000 illegal gun control laws never saved lives and instead caused a long term downward trend to suddenly reverse itself vindicates their claims. All crime rates did increase after the gun control laws were passed, causing an extra 2.1 million burglaries, 6.1 million larcenies, 1.3 million auto thefts, 1 million aggravated assaults, and 572,000 robberies, each year.
On average, each new gun control law killed 25, imprisoned 12, burglarized 1,909, enabled 5,545 larcenies, stole 1,182 cars, left 909 citizens powerless to defend themselves against assault, and removed the fear of getting shot from 520 robbers.
EVERY EXTRA $13 MILLION EDUCATION DOLLARS KILLS ONE AMERICAN
Mostly because of American blacks, education spending as a percent of U.S. GDP increased from 4% to 8%, causing us to spend an extra $7 trillion for education. This colossal and mistaken effort, which passed the point of diminishing returns in 1959, was followed by a 98 point drop in SAT scores, our dead last placement in 17 of 34 TIMSS subjects, and 550,000 extra homicides. For every 13 million extra dollars which were spent in this futile attempt to educate the uneducable, one American was murdered.
NIGGER CONTROL vs. GUN CONTROL
In 1994, there was a 350 fold difference in murder rates across the nation, with a rate of 70 per 100,000 population in the nation's capitol Washington, and 0.2 in the almost exclusively White North Dakota. All large cities with a high population of blacks had high homicide rates, up to 40 times higher than Mesa, Arizona with almost no Blacks. This can only be explained by Washington having one of the highest percentage of Blacks of any US city. Los Angeles with a population of 3.7 million had 247 murders in 2000, a rate of 6.7, which can only be explained by the population being 40% Hispanic.
With a homicide rate of 79.4, Gary, Indiana, with a population of Blacks even greater than Washington, DC, leads the nation in homicides, beating even the nation's capitol at 70. State to state and city to city, homicide rates track closely to the populations of blacks and Hispanics, with blacks committing homicide at a rate of 52 per 100,000 blacks, Hispanics at 27 per 100,000 Hispanics, and Whites at 0.7 per 100,000 Whites. So how can homicide rates greater than 70, like those in Gary and Washington, which are 40% higher than the average rate at which blacks commit homicide, be explained?
The only answer can be that homicides per 100,000 population by race are as follows:
Whites = 0.7.
Hispanics = 27.
Blacks = 52.


Definition: Total recorded intentional homicides, completed. Crime statistics are often better indicators of prevalence of law enforcement and willingness to report crime, than actual prevalence. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.Amount
| Rank | Country | Homicide rate per 1,000 people | |
| 1. | Colombia | 0.6 | |
| 2. | South Africa | 0.5 | |
| 3. | Jamaica | 0.3 | |
| 4. | Venezuela | 0.3 | |
| 5. | Russia | 0.2 | |
| 6. | Mexico | 0.1 | |
| 7. | Estonia | 0.1 | |
| 8. | Latvia | 0.1 | |
| 9. | Lithuania | 0.1 | |
| 10. | Belarus | 0.1 | |
| 11. | Ukraine | 0.1 | |
| 12. | Papua New Guinea | 0.1 | |
| 13. | Kyrgyzstan | 0.1 | |
| 14. | Thailand | 0.1 | |
| 15. | Moldova | 0.1 | |
| 16. | Zimbabwe | 0.1 | |
| 17. | Seychelles | 0.1 | |
| 18. | Zambia | 0.1 | |
| 19. | Costa Rica | 0.1 | |
| 20. | Poland | 0.1 | |
| 21. | Georgia | 0.1 | |
| 22. | Uruguay | 0.05 | |
| 23. | Bulgaria | 0.04 | |
| 24. | United States | 0.04 | |
| 25. | Armenia | 0.04 |
| 26. | India | 0.03 | |
| 27. | Yemen | 0.03 | |
| 28. | Dominica | 0.03 | |
| 29. | Azerbaijan | 0.03 | |
| 30. | Finland | 0.03 | |
| 31. | Slovakia | 0.03 | |
| 32. | Romania | 0.03 | |
| 33. | Portugal | 0.02 | |
| 34. | Malaysia | 0.02 | |
| 35. | Macedonia | 0.02 | |
| 36. | Mauritius | 0.02 | |
| 37. | Hungary | 0.02 | |
| 38. | Korea, South | 0.02 | |
| 39. | Slovenia | 0.02 | |
| 40. | France | 0.02 | |
| 41. | Czech Republic | 0.02 | |
| 42. | Iceland | 0.02 | |
| 43. | Australia | 0.02 | |
| 44. | Canada | 0.01 | |
| 45. | Chile | 0.01 | |
| 46. | United Kingdom | 0.01 | |
| 47. | Italy | 0.01 | |
| 48. | Spain | 0.01 | |
| 49. | Germany | 0.01 | |
| 50. | Tunisia | 0.01 |
| 51. | Netherlands | 0.01 | |
| 52. | New Zealand | 0.01 | |
| 53. | Denmark | 0.01 | |
| 54. | Norway | 0.01 | |
| 55. | Ireland | 0.01 | |
| 56. | Switzerland | 0.01 | |
| 57. | Indonesia | 0.01 | |
| 58. | Greece | 0.01 | |
| 59. | Hong Kong | 0.01 | |
| 60. | Japan | 0.005 | |
| 61. | Saudi Arabia | 0.004 | |
| 62. | Qatar | 0.001 | |
| Weighted Average | 0.1 |
If Whites in this country actually DO commit murder at a rate MUCH ,MUCH higher than their genetic brethren in Ireland or Denmark or Norway, then WHY? The mere presence of BLACKS?
However, I don't believe this is true, as there are 3,916 blacks in North Dakota, and their presence there wasn't enough to raise ND's homicide rate much higher than 0.2 (although if these 3,916 blacks are between the age of 14-24 and commit homicide at the national average of 1 per 1,000 blacks, then they alone would have killed 3-4 people).
The following is based on the assumption (which may be faulty) that the presence of blacks doesn't raise the homicide rate of Whites, but that a large concentration of blacks causes an unusually large spate of genocide of their own kind, plus a significant spill over to other races.
When Washington's homicide rate was 80.6, it was not ALL blacks. It was "only" 80% blacks, 10% Hispanics, 5% Whites, and 5% Asians. So the actual homicide rate of the blacks themselves had to have been higher than 80.6.
0.5 x 5% + 0.5 x 5% + 30 x 10% + X x 80% = 80.6
2.5 + 2.5 + 3 + .8X = 80.6
.8X = 72.6
X = 90.75
So the ACTUAL homicide rate amongst blacks when they're concentrated together like they are in DC and Gary and Detroit and New Orleans is 90.7 (or at least this is what it was in DC).
BUT--let's look at New Orleans, whose homicide rate at 85.8 in 1994 was even HIGHER than DC, yet the percentage of blacks was only 62% (and 4% Hispanic, 2% Asian, and 38% White).
0.5 x 38% + 0.5 x 2% + 30 x 4% + X x 62% = 85.8
0.19 + 0.01 + 1.2 + .62X = 85.8
.62X = 84.4
X = 136.1
SO, in New Orleans, blacks actually committed homicide at a rate of 136.1, almost 50% greater than in DC, making DC blacks seem quite tame by comparison.
The $64,000 question is: for what reason do you believe blacks in New Orleans are 50% more violent than those in DC, who're 18 TIMES more violent than blacks in Mozambique, who're 10 TIMES more violent than Saudi Arabians, who're TWICE as violent as North Dakotans, who're TWICE as violent as Singaporeans?
Whites?












Modified Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party