|
| |
> You know, it's guys like you who make it easy to paint all
> white guys as racist hate filled boobs, and all the proof
> that people need to continue to use white guys as multicultural
> punching bags.
As if though you needed some help arriving at your RACIST beliefs, Hu!?
It seems like you still don't get the point, so let's lay it out for you, nice and
clear!
In the first place, us "racist hate filled white guys" don't care
what you chinks, niggers, kikes, latrinos, and other muds and cruds think of us, so take
your "opinions" back to chinkland where people might care to listen to your
breed of garbage (though it's doubtful if you'd even gain an audience in chinkland if you
started out calling everyone who disagreed with you "hate filled",
"racist", "boobs", and "punching bags").
Yes, you do have a right to disagree with us, and even to claim that disagreeing with
your BIASED opinion is "hate"--but so do we. It was when you proved that
you believe that only muds and cruds have such a right, and that "white guys"
don't (most likely because you believe that some "white guy" somewhere
along the line hurt your collective feelings by refusing to hire, associate with,
"love", or live with some mud or crud like you) that you lost a champion for
Asians who FORMERLY would have supported you. Thanks to your missive, though, those
days are over. It's when you assert that our right to free speech is superceded by
your right to not "have your feelings hurt" [read: be called a chink] that we
part company [read: you lose].
Why do you lose? Because 72% of Americans are pure Israelites who are descendants
of the Twelve Tribes of Israel, and another 6% are Hispanics who are descendants of the
Tribe of Simeon (who mistakenly did miscegenate with Moors, niggers, kikes and other muds
and cruds before they finally wised up and exiled them). This means that 78% of
Americans are heirs to the Covenant God made with Abraham through Jacob, and we've had a
long history of putting away non-Israelites:
Does this clear things up for you, Hu? Do you understand that the 22% of
Americans who are NOT Israelites have no right to be here in the first place, and that
it's our religious duty to exile them? That means the 12% who are niggers, the 2%
who are kikes, the 2% who are Muslims, the 4% who are chinks, and the rest who are
latrinos and muds and cruds--must go? You just don't belong here, and if you're
wondering who it is that's going to remove you, and how they're going to do it, they're
the ones called "Whites" by judeo-Christians, "Caucasians" by the new
world order, "honkeys" by niggers, "blancos" by latrinos,
"yanquis" by Mexicans, "norte Americanos" by Central Americans,
"pale faces" by Indians, "gaejins" by Japs, "round eyes" by
Gooks and you Chinks, and "goyim" and "gentiles" by kikes.
It's doubtful if you've heard even ONE Israelite complain about these attempted racial
slurs, whereas you muds and cruds are log jamming our courts and the internet with your
sad (but no longer credible) tales of "racial discrimination". This is
just one reason that Israelites don't believe we owe you chinks the time of day, Hu, much
less do we need your web design advice. But we certainly do appreciate your
effective way of reminding us that it's way past time to remove your sorry as.es from the
land that WE fought and died for, that WE developed into the once-highest standard of
living known to man, and that we must now reclaim it from you muds and cruds. It's
not your land nor your heritage, so how fitting that you'd claim as your own [through OUR
copyright laws] the studies and tests designed, administered, and compiled by Israelites
(without the need for one single chink brain cell). It exemplifies how the Asian
mind works, or fails to--and why we don't need nor want any more of it in this Israelite
nation.
How fitting also that you never learned how jews LIED to you about having an IQ of 115.
Israel, which is 85% "jews", scored only 466 in TIMSS math, which should
have given you a clue about this LIE. Why didn't your "superior Asian
intellect" pick up on it, Hu?
You're right about one thing, which is that we DO have a right to free speech.
But this misses the much bigger point that we have a far greater right, and
infinitely more moral authority, and the monumental legal responsibility, and the tested
and proven religious conviction, to immediately review our immigration policy,
retroactively correct the error, and post haste remove you whiners, welfare queens, and
all other muds and cruds who would dare to show such hatred and contempt for the pure
principles of the US Constitution, and the WHITE MEN who wrote it, as you have.
All references to your name will be removed from the web site and replaced with this
letter, not because we respect any putative copyright you claim for OUR data, but because
you chinks no longer deserve such recognition anyway, and because we don't want this web
site to be associated with a whining chink.
Take your complaint to the leadership of China and leave us in peace.
--- arthur hu <arthurhu@attbi.com> wrote:
> You know, it's guys like you who make it easy to paint
> all
> white guys as racist hate filled boobs, and all the
> proof
> that people need to continue to use white guys as
> multicultural
> punching bags.
>
> Are you comfortable with being a racist hate filled
> moronic
> boob? I don't have a problem with my chinese ancestry,
> but
> that doesn't make me a bad person. Is a racist hate
> filled
> moronic boob a bad person? I'd think that's pretty
> obvious.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fathers' Manifesto
> [mailto:fathersmanifesto@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:18 AM
> To: arthur hu; johnknight@usa.com; jwknight@polbox.com
> Cc: karlgranat@msn.com
> Subject: RE: IQ spectrum
>
>
>
>
> If you don't like the word "chinaman", then try CHINK
> on
> for size, Hu.
>
> The more we think about your STUPID demand that you
> STUPID chinks have the right to tell us how to speak,
> what words to use, how to frame our web site, the more
> it
> becomes obvious that not even you chinks deserve to
> live
> under the protection of the US Constitution.
>
> If you don't like the concept of free speech, then go
> back to chinkland.
>
> You are repugnant enough that we might do you the favor
> of exiling you before you take the time to remove
> yourself from our property on your own.
>
> It's truly unbelievable that you "think" you have some
> kind of a built in chink right to critique our US
> Constitution. You don't. You also need to go back
> where
> your own kind can appreciate you and yours.
>
>
> Bon voyage,
>
>
> John Knight
>
>
>
>
>
> --- arthur hu <arthurhu@attbi.com> wrote:
> > Well, I guess if there was any question about your
> site
> > being
> > hosted by hateful and rude persons who wish nothing
> but
> > ill
> > toward their fellow non-white Americans, this pretty
> > much settles
> > it. Yes, you have a right to express your own
> opinions,
> > and
> > hate anybody you like for whatever reason. You might
> > even have the
> > right to call people niggers, jew boys, and aryans.
> >
> > However, under US copyright law, you _do_ need my
> > permission to use my table verbatim as you have done,
> > since it is
> > my compilation. I won't bother with trying to
> actually
> > trying to
> > hire any lawyers or anything like that, but rely on
> > your own
> > decency and courtesy to follow the law and
> nettiquette.
> >
> > Like I said, I do very much mind being associated
> with
> > white
> > supremacists who hate people who don't look like
> them\
> >
> > I
> > would be willing to permit you to use the table
> > provided you
> > remove insulting and harmful terms towards other
> ethnic
> > groups
> > (and in case you are not aware, Chinaman hasn't been
> an
> > acceptable term for Chinese since the late 1800s)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Fathers' Manifesto
> > [mailto:fathersmanifesto@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:26 AM
> > To: arthur hu; johnknight@usa.com;
> jwknight@polbox.com
> > Cc: karlgranat@msn.com; Arthur Jenny Hu
> > Subject: Re: IQ spectrum
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If you don't like the concept of free speech,
> Chinaman,
> > go back to China!!
> >
> >
> > The LAST thing this country needs is one more phony
> > baloney snivel rights group whining about how
> somebody
> > hurt their feelings.
> >
> > Guess what?! WE DON'T CARE what you "think"!! You
> > should NEVER have been here in the first place.
> >
> > Bon Voyage!!
> >
> >
> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
> > --- arthur hu <arthurhu@attbi.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, somebody found my numbers on your site, but I
> > don't
> > > appreciate being associated with a page that uses
> > terms
> > > like "jew boys" and "nigger girls". You certainly
> > have
> > > every
> > > right to look out for ther interests of your own
> race
> > > and
> > > religion, but that does not excuse you from having
> > the
> > > manners
> > > of not using hateful names for those of other
> groups.
> > >
> > > Please either remove your copy of my table, or
> change
> > > your
> > > page with less offensive terminology. At least you
> > > don't
> > > refer to Asians as "Chinks and Japs", I would
> expect
> > > you to
> > > extend the same amount of courtesy to blacks and
> > Jews.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear Mr. Hu,
> > >
> > > I found a source of your information on SAT scores.
> > >
> > > http://christianparty.net/sathu2.htm
> > >
> > > I am really impressed by your scolarship- you have
> > > provided a lot of solid
> > > information that is not easilly available.
> > >
> > > One thing- on one of the sites that quotes your
> > > figures, the question is
> > > asked: why doesn't SAT scores equate to grade
> scores-
> > >
> > > I have know three college professors, and they have
> > all
> > > said that there is a
> > > tremendous pressure on them to pass Black students-
> > the
> > > majority of which
> > > could not pass a class unless they were given
> special
> > > treatment in grading.
> > >
> > > If the Proffessors try to fail those students- they
> > > face the real
> > > possibility of racism.
> > >
> > > It does not take many of those instances for a
> > college
> > > proffessor to realize
> > > that many more of those incidents would bode ill
> for
> > > his future at the
> > > institution.
> > >
> > > This information is from the only three college
> > > proffessors that I have
> > > known. When colleges talk about "Minorities"
> > receiving
> > > preferential
> > > treatment, they are not talking about Jews,
> Japanese,
> > > Chinese, or East
> > > Indian peoples.
> > >
> > > Anyway, thanks again for your infromation- I have
> > sent
> > > you site to several
> > > people-
> > >
> > > Karl Granat
> > > Salem, Oregon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
| |
|
