Immigration

NPG’s position is that total immigration, which now adds at least 1.3 million to the US population each year, must be reduced by at least 80 percent if population growth is to end and then recede over time to a long-term sustainable level of 150 million Americans. The most practical place to start is by strictly enforcing the laws already on the books against illegal entry and residence with the aim of reducing net annual US growth from illegal immigration and births to illegal residents from some three-quarters of a million yearly to near zero.

NPG has conservatively estimated the current illegal alien population at between ten million and fifteen million. In October 2007 at a Washington press conference, however, Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS - a nonprofit public interest organization) released reports from four of its experts variously estimating that 18 million to 38 million illegal aliens may now be in the US, with the permanent stock of illegals estimated as increasing yearly at between 1.3 million and 4.0 million.

Mexico requires that an American immigrant must prove that he has a source of income which is at least 43 times the minimum wage in Mexico City at the time of his immigration.  We however have no such requirement--with few exceptions, immigrants to the US don't need to show an income, a degree, an ability to manage or own a business, Personal Savings, intelligence, morality, nor a faith in nor an understanding of Christianity.  Most other countries, as well as the US until recent memory, had sensible immigration policies, as evidenced by what the jew thought of US Immigration policy as recently as 1924:

Gould's most inflammatory allegation consists of blaming IQ testers for magnifying the toll of those lost in the Holocaust (p. 263). Here he has followed the lead of Leon Kamin's (1974) The Science and Politics of IQ. The Kamin-Gould thesis is that early IQ testers claimed their research proved that Jews as a group scored low on their tests and that this finding was then conveniently used to support passage of the restrictive Immigration Act of 1924 which then denied entry to hapless Jewish refugees in the 1930s. Gould goes so far as to claim (1996, pp. 195-198; 255-258) that Henry H. Goddard (in 1917) and Carl C. Brigham (in 1923) labeled four-fifths of Jewish immigrants as "feeble-minded ... morons". 

To accomodate the jew, immigration policy was turned upside down and an intelligent standard was replaced by no standard, thus violating the religious rights of the vast majority of Americans.  To 264 million putative Christians in this putative Christian nation, the Statue of Liberty isn't our law, because the Holy Bible is:

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.
I lift my lamp beside the golden door."

Contrast this with what the Holy Bible says:

California voters were so incensed by the problems caused by lax immigration policy that we passed Proposition 187 by an overwhelming majority, to restrict immigration to the state in a way that the federal government should have but failed.  Federal judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer single-handedly disobeyed the will of we the people and struck down what would have been law and a giant step closer to what we the people want, to what our Forefathers wanted, and to what our Holy Bible requires.

What did Mariana know about the "constitutionality" of a law which the Authors of our Constitution would have embraced with open arms?  Not much.  Was she misled, as millions of Americans are misled, when she read the inscription on the Jefferson Memorial "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free"?   Doe she deal in half truths because she was educated in half truths?  Does she know what Mr. Jefferson really thought about the differences between the Caucasoid and Negroid Races?:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them."

Besides ignoring popular opinion, and the opinion of one of our premier Founding Forefathers, and not really understanding or adding a thing to what is and what is not "constitutional", and comitting an outright act of treason against her own oath of office, and making a mere rag out of our once proud US Constitution, what else did Mariana know?  Consider Mr. Lincoln's words on the matter:

"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races."  Spoken at Springfield, Illinois, July 17, 1858;   ABRAHAM LINCOLN COMPLETE WORKS, edited by Nicolay and Hay, published by The Century Company, 1894,   Volume I, p. 273

So who is this minority of Americans who Marianna supports, and why does she support this minority at the great expense of the majority?

Posterity

http://www.rpi.edu/~eglash/eglash.dir/itsc.dir/notes1_11.htm

C. Brigham (US 1923):

Defends work of Yerkes, supports application to immigration law

Cultural bias is OK because we don’t want immigrants who “don’t think like Americans.”

Explained correlation of IQ with amount of time in U.S. using absolute rather than relative time.

Explanation for lower IQ in non-english speaking “Nordics”: “that’s just cultural difference”

Impact of the Army IQ test results for African Americans and Jews: segregation and 1924 immigration restriction act.

http://www.eugenics.net/papers/jprnr.html

Gould's most inflammatory allegation is to blame IQ testers for increasing the toll of the Holocaust. His thesis is that early IQ testers claimed Jews as a group scored low on their tests. This finding was then allegedly used to support passage of the restrictive Immigration Act of 1924, under which Jewish refugees were denied entry in the 1930s. Gould even claims that Henry H. Goddard in 1917 and Carl C. Brigham in 1923 labeled four-fifths of Jewish immigrants as ``feeble-minded . . . morons.''

http://adrr.com/law0/pr5y5.htm

What most people do not know is that a generation ago, when IQ and achievement tests were first administered, Jewish and Asian students were at the bottom of the test groups and deemed racially inferior.

Test scores "proved" that Jews and Asians were inferior and hopeless. Now, test scores prove that Jews and Asians are superior and that other groups are hopeless.

If you believe that, I have some ocean front property in Arizona I'd like to sell you ...

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/interviews/lemann.html

Brigham wrote a book in 1923 called A Study of American Intelligence. This was based on his work on the Army Alpha Test. He analyzed the test results by race and found--as people who do that have always found--that people of color, Jews, Mediterraneans, anybody who wasn't a kind of what he would call a Nordic, was inherently intellectually inferior. And that the country was in big trouble because two many of these people were coming into the country. So this book is a kind of very ripe, racist book by today's standards, typical of establishment thinking of the time, although Brigham, you know, bothered to write it down. And it just stands up very well as an offensive piece of writing. Now, Brigham renounced it within about five years. To his great credit, he specifically disowned the book. He changed his mind, he broke with the eugenics movement and by the end of his life, was really one of the leading critics, of the eugenics movement. So he came around and deserves a lot of credit for that.