|
| |
jew race
"OUR RACE IS THE MASTER RACE. WE ARE DIVINE GODS ON THIS PLANET.
WE ARE AS DIFFERENT FROM THE INFERIOR RACES AS THEY ARE FROM INSECTS. IN
FACT, COMPARED TO OUR RACE, OTHER RACES ARE BEASTS AND ANIMALS, CATTLE AT BEST.
OTHER RACES ARE CONSIDERED AS HUMAN EXCREMENT. OUR DESTINY IS TO
RULE OVER THE INFERIOR RACES. OUR EARTHLY KINGDOM WILL BE RULED BY OUR
LEADER WITH A ROD OF IRON. THE MASSES WILL LICK OUR FEET AND SERVE US AS
OUR SLAVES."
MENACHEM
BEGIN,
FORMER PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL
Furthermore, jews claim that their RACE is of EDOMITE
origin:
The preface of The Jewish Encyclopedia, signed by Cyrus Adler, is this
statement:
'An even more delicate problem that presented itself at the very outset was the
attitude to be observed by the encyclopedia in regard to those Jews who, while
born within the Jewish community, have, for one reason or another, abandoned it.
As the present work deals with the Jews as a race, it was found impossible to
exclude those who were of that race, whatever their religious affiliations might
have been.'
"In the same encyclopedia is a statement by Joseph Jacobs, B.A., formerly
president of the Jewish Historical Society of England:
'Anthropologically considered, the Jews are a race of markedly uniform type, due
either to unity of race or to similarity of environment.'
One of the first things I discovered is that while Gentiles who call the Jews a
"race" are condemned, Jewish leaders have for centuries routinely called
themselves a race. The leader of American Jewry in the 1930s, Rabbi Stephen F.
Wise, said it succinctly in this dramatic statement,
"Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race and we are a
race."
Right up to the present day, there are many statements illustrating how Jewish
leaders matter-of-factly view themselves not just as a religion, but as an
identifiable race, genetically distinguishable from other peoples.
Nahum Goldman, one of the leading Jews of the 20th Century and former president
of the World Zionist Organization, said it very bluntly:
.The Jews are divided into two categories, those who admit they belong to a race
distinguished by a history thousands of years old, and those who don't. The
latter are open to the charge of dishonesty.
The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to Jewish group
in southern California said:
"If Israel had not come into existence after World War II then I am certain the
Jewish race wouldn't have survived.I stand before you and say you must
strengthen your commitment to Israel."
An editorial entitled "Some Other Race" in the New York weekly Forward (A very
prestigious Jewish publication) urges Jews to list themselves on the U.S.
Government census form as a race. It goes on to suggest:
". On question eight [of the form, which asks about race], you might consider
doing what more than one member of our redaktzia [editorial staff] has done:
checking the box 'some other race' and writing in the word 'Jew'."
Charles Bronfman, a main sponsor of the $210 million "Birthright Israel," an
organization specifically committed to preventing intermarriage between Jews and
Gentiles, expressed the need to preserve the Jewish genetic character as
expressed in the Jewish DNA.
Bronfman is brother of Edgar Bronfman, Sr., president of the World Jewish
Congress. He said,
".you're losing a lot - losing the kind of feeling you have when you know [that]
throughout the world there are people who somehow or other have the same kind of
DNA that you have."
To themselves, jews are a race, but to us "gentiles" jews are only a religion
);
Senator Lodge—"Do you
deny that the word 'Jew' is used to express a race?"
Mr. Wolf—"As the representative of the Union of American Hebrew
Congregations—which I have been for nearly 30 years—I took up the matter and
propounded a series of interrogations to some of the leading Jews of the United States,
among others * * * Dr. Cyrus Adler, who was librarian of the Smithsonian * * * and every
one of them states that the Jews are not a race."
Senator Lodge—"That, I think, is an important point. I have always supposed they
were. I find in the preface of The Jewish Encyclopedia, which is signed by Cyrus Adler,
among others this statement:
'An even more delicate problem that presented itself at the very outset was the attitude
to be observed by the encyclopedia in regard to those Jews who, while born within the
Jewish community, have, for one reason or another, abandoned it. As the present work deals
with the Jews as a race, it was found impossible to exclude those who were of that race,
whatever their religious affiliations might have been.'
"In the same encyclopedia is a statement by Joseph Jacobs, B.A., formerly president
of the Jewish Historical Society of England:
'Anthropologically considered, the Jews are a race of markedly uniform type, due either to
unity of race or to similarity of environment.'
"Do you mean to deny—I want to understand your position—that the word 'Jew'
is a racial term?"
Mr. Wolf—"I have made my statement, and my opinions are in this pamphlet."
Are Jews a Race?.What They Themselves Say!
An excerpt from David Duke's Jewish Supremacism.
One of the first things I discovered is that while Gentiles who call the Jews a
"race" are condemned, Jewish leaders have for centuries routinely called
themselves a race. The leader of American Jewry in the 1930s, Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, said
it succinctly in this dramatic statement,
"Hitler was right
in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race and we are a race."
Right up to the present day, there are many statements illustrating how Jewish leaders
matter-of-factly view themselves not just as a religion, but as an identifiable race,
genetically distinguishable from other peoples.
Nahum Goldman, one of the leading Jews of the 20th Century and former president of the
World Zionist Organization, said it very bluntly:
.The Jews are divided
into two categories, those who admit they belong to a race distinguished by a history
thousands of years old, and those who don't. The latter are open to the charge of
dishonesty.
The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to Jewish group in
southern California said:
"If Israel had
not come into existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race wouldn't have
survived.I stand before you and say you must strengthen your commitment to Israel."
An editorial entitled "Some Other Race" in the New York weekly Forward (A
very prestigious Jewish publication) urges Jews to list themselves on the U.S. Government
census form as a race. It goes on to suggest:
". On question
eight [of the form, which asks about race], you might consider doing what more than one
member of our redaktzia [editorial staff] has done: checking the box 'some other race' and
writing in the word 'Jew'."
Charles Bronfman, a main sponsor of the $210 million "Birthright Israel," an
organization specifically committed to preventing intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles,
expressed the need to preserve the Jewish genetic character as expressed in the Jewish
DNA.
Bronfman is brother of Edgar Bronfman, Sr., president of the World Jewish Congress. He
said,
".you're losing a
lot - losing the kind of feeling you have when you know [that] throughout the world there
are people who somehow or other have the same kind of DNA that you have."
Imagine for a moment if President George Bush would speak to a group of White college
students and tell them how great it is for them know that others in the world share their
White DNA, and that they should not lose it by intermarrying with other races. Bush could
live to 100 years old and still never live down a remark like that!
During his campaign for President in 2000, Bush spoke before dozens of Jewish
organizations and Synagogues that oppose intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews. The
media only had praise for those appearances. In contrast, Bush faced universal criticism
by the Jewish media by simply speaking at a conservative Christian university (Bob Jones
University) that quietly opposes racial intermarriage. After the media unleashed a storm
of criticism, Bush had to quickly apologize and then passionately condemn Bob Jones
University for its position. Of course, within a few days, Bush was again speaking before
many Jewish groups that stridently oppose intermarriage, yet no one in the media dared
object to these appearances, or to even point out this blatant double standard.
"The
distinctive character of the Jew does not arise solely from his religion. It is true that
his race and religion are indissolubly connected, . . . . but whatever be the cause of
this junction of the race idea with the religion, it is very certain that the religion
alone does not constitute the people. A believer in the Jewish faith does not by reason of
that fact become a Jew. On the other hand, however, a Jew by birth remains a Jew, even
though he abjures his religion."
—Leo N. Levi, President of B'nai B'rith 1900-1904.
How Jews in the U.S. Conceal
Their Strength
How many Jews are there in the United States? No Gentile knows. The figures are exclusive
property of the Jewish authorities. The government of the United States can provide
statistics on almost every matter pertaining to the population of the country,
but whenever it has attempted in a systematic way to get information about the Jews who
are constantly entering the country
and the number now resident here, the Jewish lobby at Washington steps in and stops it.
For more than 20 years the fight for the right of the United States Government to make a
complete census of the people has
been going on, and for the same period the Jewish lobby at the Capitol has been strong
enough to win.
The alarming increase in Jewish immigration at the present time has brought the question
to public attention again. For the
first time in the history of the United States a national conviction is forming upon this
subject. From Europe came the first
news which startled this country. The reports told of vast mobilizations of Jewish people
at stated rendezvous in Europe.
Great barracks were built for them. Large bodies of trained men went from the United
States under orders of Jewish secret societies here, to expedite "passport
work," as it is termed among those bodies. Immigration into the United States became
a business—a strictly Jewish business.
Why is that statement made?—"a strictly Jewish business." For this reason:
there are countries in Europe from which today
no Gentile can be admitted to the United States. From Germany, from Russia, from Poland,
it is with the utmost difficulty that
even one person can be won permission to enter this country. But Jews from Poland,
Germany, and Russia by the thousands
come in most freely, in utter disregard of the laws, in open contempt of the health
regulations—a strictly Jewish business of
getting another million Jews into the United States. It is like moving an army, which
having done duty in Europe for the
subjugation of that continent, is now being transferred to America.
When the conditions overseas were made known in this country and it became apparent that
Jewish societies in the United
States were the principal aids in this stampede to America, the newspapers for the first
time in American history began to comment on a Jewish Question in tones of alarm. This in
itself is an indication that the facts are becoming too challenging
to be longer ignored.
Even the ordinary immigration officials, who for years have watched the human stream as it
flowed over Ellis Island, have
this year been startled into attention and action by the sharp change that has come in the
character of the stream. And what
has startled them?
First, it is composed almost entirely of Jews. Real Ukranians, real Russians, real Germans
cannot come in. But Jews can
come from anywhere, and are coming from almost everywhere. Why this special
privilege?—is being asked.
Second, they do not come as refugees, as people fleeing from hunger and persecution: they
come as if they own the country.
They arrive as special guests. As on the other side the passport business is
"arranged," so on this side the entrance business
is "arranged." The laws are set aside. Health regulations are ignored. Why
should they not behave as if they own the United States? They see officials of Jewish
secret societies override officials of the United States Immigration Bureau. Their first
glimpse of life here shows a Jewish control as potent and complete as it is in Russia. No
wonder then that they literally beat
down the walls and gates with all the �clat of a victorious invasion. Is not this
America—"The Jews' Country," as it is called
in the smaller nations of Europe?
Third, there is a perfect organization which overcomes the numerous objections which arise
against admission of known revolutionary Jews. European Jews are potential revolutionists.
They are the revolutionists of Italy, Germany, Russia and
Poland today. They are the Red and I.W.W. leaders of the United States today. When one man
whose record is known
presents himself at Ellis Island—and of course he is one in a thousand whose records
are not known—he is held up.
Immediately there start across the country telegrams to Congressmen, editors, state and
municipal officials telling them
in peremptory tones to "get busy" in behalf of Mr. So-and-So who is detained at
Ellis Island. And the same day there start
back to Washington telegrams from Congressmen, editors and others of influence, insisting
on the spotless character of
Mr. So-and-So and demanding his immediate admittance into the United States. Sometimes
also the Russian embassy—so-called—is used in this work.
It is an invasion—nothing but an invasion; and it is helped by influences within the
United States. It is thinly cloaked with sentiment—"these people are fleeing
from persecution." It is cleverly assisted by photographs showing groups of forlorn
looking women and children—never by photographs showing the groups of husky young
revolutionists who are just as ready
to despoil the United States as they were to despoil Russia.
That, however, is the present situation. What this and a subsequent article propose to do
for the reader is to put him in
possession of some of the facts concerning the government's fight on this question during
the last quarter century.
The question is not peculiar to America, and it may throw a sidelight on the American
phase to note some of the facts
developed at the hearings of the British Royal Commission on Alien Immigration which sat
in London in 1902, a feature
of whose proceedings was the testimony of Theodor Herzl, the great propagandist of
Zionism.
In his initial statement to the Commission, Herzl made these statements, among others:
"The fact that there is now for the first time since Cromwell a perceptible number of
our people in England is the true
cause of this Commission being called together. * * * That a serious pressure exists in
England, the fact of your
Commission sitting is full proof."
Then the examination proceeded until the following was brought out: (the answers are
Herzl's)
Q. Looking at the question of alien immigration from the standpoint of the United States
for a moment, you have referred
to the fact that America excludes?
A. Yes.
Q. The exclusion is a partial exclusion?
A. Exclusion, as I know, is worked in this way: the immigrant must show a certain amount
of money at the moment of his l
anding.
Q. You are aware that the stream of immigration into the United States is twice as much as
the immigration into the United Kingdom?
A. I know that. New York has now the greatest Jewish population of all the towns in the
world.
Q. And the actual exclusion is the actual exclusion of a small proportion?
A. Yes; but they go, however, to America. I think it is so easy to evade such a
prohibition. For instance, if they joined a
small company, it would lend the necessary amount to each immigrant, and the immigrant
shows it and comes in, and sends
back by post the amount he has borrowed. There are no efficacious measures to prevent
that.
Q. I took it that your reference to the United States was an approval of the action of
that country as an act of self-preservation.
A. No.
A little later on in the examination, the question of immigration to the United States was
again brought in. The answers are
still Dr. Herzl's—remember that the date is still 1902:
Q. Are you aware whether it is the fact or not that the leading Jews in America have
informed their correspondents here
that they cannot receive and distribute any more Jewish immigrants?
A. I have heard of difficulties of emigration, and that they are overcrowded with Jews. As
to that information I cannot say.
Q. In your opinion would not the stream of emigration to America have been much greater if
no such law had existed?
A. I think this law did not alter it much. The prohibition could not change it.
Q. On what grounds do you believe that?
A. It is a question of coasts and harbors. They come in. How will you prevent a man from
coming in?
Q. Do you mean they are smuggled in?
A. No, I do not believe that. But they always find means to come in.
Now, discussion of immigration in the United States has never been free. We have talked a
great deal about it in general
terms, but not in terms of specific races except the Chinese and Japanese. However, Herzl
seems to have known that
wherever the Jews congregate in noticeable numbers they become a trouble (his words are:
"* * * America, where so soon
as they form a perceptible number they become a trouble and a burden to the land")
and he also knew that efforts would
be made to meet that condition. But more than that, he dropped what must be construed as a
warning, that such efforts
would be resisted. He said:
"There exists a French proverb, 'cet animal est tres impatient; il se defend quand on
l'attaque.' If the Jews are attacked,
they will defend themselves, and you will get something like internal troubles."
The time apparently did come in the United States when some far-seeing official began to
wonder what the Jewish invasion portended. Already it was too strong to be openly
attacked. The Jewish lobby at Washington was powerful even at that time.
So, apparently, this official concluded that the best way to set about so momentous a task
was to collect the information.
But in order to get the information, Congress had to give its permission; and to get the
permission of Congress, hearings
had to be ordered. Hearings were ordered, and the records of them, though very scarce,
still exist. The reader will be given important extracts from them presently, and he will
see for himself how certain American statesmen reacted to the whole
matter.
A remark is in order just here, namely, that the Jewish lobby eventually became more
skillful in such matters. It now
takes very good care that no officials shall be appointed who shall make suggestions which
shall precipitate congressional
hearings on the Jewish matter. The time is coming, of course, when the whole Jewish
Question may be threshed out by the government of the United States, but it will not be
because an official precipitated it; it will be because the people will
demand it.
Officials are now much to wary to meddle with this Question. They know too well the
consequences. During the war
many a secret trail of danger led into Jewish quarters, and the secret service man who
loyally made his reports was
often surprised to find himself lifted completely off that trail. Why? All Jewish trails
in this country were powerfully
protected by hidden influences during the war.
Well, the time came in the United States, when it was obviously desirable to know what
elements were comprising our
population; whether we were an Anglo-Saxon nation, Semitic, Latin, or what. The situation
was this, and was so stated
by government officials at the time:—In the '80's, and previously, it could be safely
assumed that an immigrant from
Ireland was Irish, an immigrant from Norway or Sweden was Scandinavian, an immigrant from
Russia was Russian,
an immigrant from Germany was German, and so on.
But times changed. Previous to 1880, the entry on a man's record—"born in
Russia"—indicated that he was a Russian.
But, says a statement made by a government official with reference to the 10 years
following 1880—"So many Hebrews
have come from that country to the United States, that 'born in Russia' has come in
popular opinion to mean a 'Russian
Jew.'" And then the same official goes on to show that during a 10-year period when
666,561 Jews came from Russia,
there came also from Russia large numbers of Poles, Finns, Germans and Lithuanians.
Now, to make a census enumeration of these peoples under the heading "Russian"
was plainly misleading, and not
only misleading but valueless for census purposes. The racial identity would be lost, and
our knowledge of the racial
make-up of the nation very incomplete. Therefore, the census authorities asked Congress
for permission to classify
people by "race" as well as by "country of birth." It seemed perfectly
reasonable. Of what possible use is it to classify
3,000,000 Jews as "Russians" when there are very few real Russians in the
country, and when the Russian and Jew
are so deeply different one from another?
Senator Simon Guggenheim arose in the committee to object. He used the common formula in
such cases. He said:
"Personally I object to it, not because I am a Hebrew, but because it is not in
place."
That is the common Jewish formula of objection. The B'nai B'rith says the same thing when
it forces Shakespeare's
"Merchant of Venice" out of the public schools. That society's
"anti-defamation circular" always includes the thought:
—"We do not base our request on the embarrassment which may be caused to the
Jewish students in class, nor is our
attitude in this regard based on thin-skinned sensitiveness. Our objection is made because
of the effect upon the non-
Jewish children who subconsciously will associate in their minds the Jew as Shakespeare
portrayed him with the Jew
of today." So Senator Guggenheim, therefore, was playing the game according to the
rules made and established in
such cases.
At this hearing, Senator LaFollette was chairman. Senator Guggenheim's contention was that
"Jew" was the name of
a member of a religious denomination, and not of a race.
Chairman LaFollette—"I can see broad ethnological reasons why some time it would
be important to know from what
blood and race the man came."
Senator Guggenheim—"Why not ask his religion?"
Senators McCumber and Bailey came to the support of Senator Guggenheim's contention, that
"Jew" is a religious and
not a racial term.
Chairman LaFollette—"I do not just get your objection to this, Senator
Guggenheim. What objection can one have to
having the race to which he belongs correctly entered?"
Senator Guggenheim—"Because it is not correct when stated that way. The Jews are
not a race. * * *"
Later on in the hearing, Senator Cummins entered the discussion in response to a
pro-Jewish remark made by Senator
Bailey:
Senator Bailey—"If I were a Hebrew and I had been born here and they wanted me
to say I was anything but an American,
I would have a difference with the enumerator. I perhaps would refuse to answer their
questions."
Senator Cummins—"I would not have any hesitancy in stating from what blood I
was."
Senator Bailey—"No; but in the case that I refer to, it would be a matter of
religion."
Senator Guggenheim—"That is the point; it is a question of religion."
That was in April, 1909, in December, 1909, Simon Wolf was the chief witness for the
pro-Jewish contention. Simon Wolf
is a very interesting character. From before the days of President Lincoln, he has been
lobbyist for the Jews at the National Capitol, and has been in contact with every
President from Lincoln to Wilson. At the hearing where Mr. Wolf testified,
Senator Dillingham acted as chairman, and the whole proceeding was enlivened and clarified
by the vigorous part which
Senator Lodge took in it. Certain extracts, which entirely reproduce the spirit and
argument of the hearing, follow:
Mr. Wolf—"The point we make is this: A Jew coming from Russia is a Russian; from
Rumania, a Rumanian; from F
rance, a Frenchman; from England, an Englishman; and from Germany a German; that Hebrew or
Jewish is simply a
religion."
Senator Lodge—"Do I understand you to deny that the Jews are a race?"
Mr. Wolf—"How?"
Senator Lodge—"Do you deny that the word 'Jew' is used to express a race?"
Mr. Wolf—"As the representative of the Union of American Hebrew
Congregations—which I have been for nearly 30
years—I took up the matter and propounded a series of interrogations to some of the
leading Jews of the United States,
among others * * * Dr. Cyrus Adler, who was librarian of the Smithsonian * * * and every
one of them states that the
Jews are not a race."
Senator Lodge—"That, I think, is an important point. I have always supposed they
were. I find in the preface of The
Jewish Encyclopedia, which is signed by Cyrus Adler, among others this statement:
'An even more delicate problem that presented itself at the very outset was the attitude
to be observed by the encyclopedia
in regard to those Jews who, while born within the Jewish community, have, for one
reason or another, abandoned it. As
the present work deals with the Jews as a race, it was found impossible to exclude those
who were of that race, whatever
their religious affiliations might have been.'
"In the same encyclopedia is a statement by Joseph Jacobs, B.A., formerly president
of the Jewish Historical Society
of England:
'Anthropologically considered, the Jews are a race of markedly uniform type, due either to
unity of race or to similarity
of environment.'
"Do you mean to deny—I want to understand your position—that the word 'Jew'
is a racial term?"
Mr. Wolf—"I have made my statement, and my opinions are in this pamphlet."
Senator Lodge—"Let me get at it. How would you classify Benjamin Disraeli? Was
he a Jew?"
Mr. Wolf—"He was born a Jew."
Senator Lodge—"He was baptized as a Christian. He then ceased to be a Jew?"
Mr. Wolf—"Yes; religiously he ceased to be a Jew."
Senator Lodge—"Ah! Religiously. He was very proud of the fact that he was a Jew,
and always spoke of himself in that
way. Did the fact that he changed his religion alter his race?"
Mr. Wolf—"It did not change the fact that he was born a Jew; not at all; and I
know the Jewish people throughout the
world have claimed him, Heine, and Borne, and others who were born of their blood, as
being Jews, when they speak
of persons who have accomplished something wonderful in the world. But they ceased to be
Jews from the standpoint
of religion—"
Senator Lodge—"Undoubtedly. What I want to get at is whether the word 'Jew' or
'Hebrew' is not a correct racial
term?"
Mr. Wolf—"If you will pardon me, you will find a letter from Dr. Cyrus Adler
right at the close of the pamphlet, which
perhaps you might read for the benefit of the committee."
Senator Lodge—(after reading the letter referred to) "I do not think that
answers anything."
* * *
Senator Lodge—"It never occurred to me until I heard you were coming here that
the classification as made by the
immigration authorities had anything to do with religion. I supposed it was a race
classification. It is important, very
important, to get the race classification as nearly as we can."
* * *
Mr. Wolf—"You are aware that the Census Bureau some time ago attempted to
classify in the same manner and it
was prohibited from doing so."
Senator Lodge—"The word 'race' was stricken out of the census bill. I think it
was a great mistake. It makes the
returns almost valueless."
Mr. Wolf—"I can simply repeat what I have said—that I am voicing the
opinions of those whom I represent—the
Union of American Hebrew Congregations, and the Order of B'nai B'rith. They are opposed to
the classification as
made in the last few years and as contemplated, so far as I am informed, in the report of
the commission."
The hearings continued, Julian W. Mack later appearing for the Jewish contention.
From the extracts given in this article, four matters become very clear:
First, the Jew is opposed to any restrictive legislation against his entrance into a
country.
Second, the Jew is opposed to any racial classification of himself after he has entered a
country.
Third, the Jewish argument to the Gentile authorities is that the Jew represents religion
and not race.
Fourth, that at least one indication has appeared in which the Jew has one view to present
to the Gentiles, and another
which he cherishes among his own people, on this question of Race.
Another point might be made, as this: when the authorities disregard as untenable the
argument of "religion, not race,"
the Jewish spokesmen fall back on the fact that their organizations don't want certain
things and won't have certain things—argument or no argument, commission or no
commission.
The Jewish lobbyists had their way. There is no enumeration of Jews in the United States.
There are 46 other classifications,
but none for the Jew. The Northern Italians are distinguished in the records from the
Southern Italians; the Moravians are distinguished from the Bohemians; the Scotch from the
English; the Spanish-American from the Spanish-European; the
West Indians from the Mexicans—but the Jew is not distinguished at all.
None of the other races made objection. On this point the report of the commission reads:
"As far as ascertained by the commission, the practice of classifying the
foreign-born by race or people, rather than by
country of birth, is acceptable to the people of the United States with one exception.
The officials, who were endeavoring to have the Census Report show with scientific
accuracy the actual racial components
of the population of the United States, were compelled to see their recommendation
eliminated.
What is the result? If you ask the government of the United States how many Frenchmen
there are in the country, it can
give you the figures. If you ask for the number of Poles, it is there. If you ask for the
number of Africans, it is known.
On down a long list you may make your inquiries, and you will find that the government
knows.
But ask the government of the United States how many Jews are in the country—and it
cannot tell; there are no records.
If you want information upon that point, you will have to go to the officials or
representatives of the Jewish Government
in the United States.
Of course, if "Jew" is a religious term, like Baptist, Catholic, Christian
Scientist or Quaker, then there is merit in the
argument that religious questions are not proper for the government to ask unless the
religion comes in conflict with,
or is a menace to, the ideals of the Republic. But if "Jew" is a racial term, or
a national term, then the government is
properly interested in making record of all the inhabitants of this land who bear it.
Like all questions pertaining to the Jews, this can be settled by their own words. What
the Jews teach the Jews on t
his matter should be the determining point. In the next article we shall see what Jews
themselves have to say about
"race or religion?"
[THE DEARBORN INDEPENDENT, issue of 9 October
1920]
|
| |
|
