|
|
|
It’s not just this ONE jew publication which
claims jews are Edomites—it’s ALL of them, with the
following being just a select few: · Why would the jewish encyclopedia mention that "edom is in
modern jewry" if it weren’t true? that is your very own writings not the klan!
why the kkk reference and where is your proof? "EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY." The
Jewish Ency. 1925 Ed., Vol. 5, Pg. 41. “IT DOESN'T. YOU ARE LYING.
THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT ANYWHERE, much less on page 41 of Vol. 5.” · The [non-Israelite] Edomites became a section of the Jewish
people. "EDOM," Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem,
Israel: Encyclopaedia Judaica Company, 1971) Vol. 6, p. 378 “YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH
STATEMENT. · They [the non-Israelite Edomites] were then incorporated with the
Jewish nation…. "EDOM, IDUMEA," The Jewish Encyclopedia (New York &
London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1904) Vol. V, p. 41 YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT. · …from then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a
part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants.
"EDOM (Idumea)," The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY:
Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589 YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT., Jon Moseley
· …they [the Edomites] were hereafter
no other than [non-Israelite] Jews. Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews (Grand
Rapids, MI: Dregel Publications, 1960) Book XIII, Chapter IX, Verse 1, p. 279 “ YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT Jon Moseley
Again, Moseley claims that jews LIE by claiming his
OWN publications FABRICATED this link of jews to Edomites.
SCRIPTURE backs it up, which is about the ONLY time
Scripture ever agreed with these filthy kikes, their foul TalMUD, and their other
scatological screeds. Received:
by 10.142.230.5 with SMTP id c5cs499774wfh; Sat, 24 Nov
2007 20:27:52 -0800 (PST) Received:
by 10.70.92.12 with SMTP id p12mr2087138wxb.1195964871131; Sat, 24 Nov
2007 20:27:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path:
<sentto-16843163-10612-1195964868-fm=fathersmanifesto.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com> Received:
from blackexodus.us (s15.n52.vds2000.com [66.84.52.15]) by
mx.google.com with ESMTP id 30si203554hso.2007.11.24.20.27.50; Sat, 24 Nov
2007 20:27:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF:
neutral (google.com: 66.84.52.15 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of
sentto-16843163-10612-1195964868-fm=fathersmanifesto.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com)
client-ip=66.84.52.15; DomainKey-Status:
bad Authentication-Results:
mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 66.84.52.15 is neither permitted nor denied by
domain of
sentto-16843163-10612-1195964868-fm=fathersmanifesto.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com)
smtp.mail=sentto-16843163-10612-1195964868-fm=fathersmanifesto.net@returns.groups.yahoo.com;
domainkeys=hardfail header.From=Israelites@yahoogroups.com Received:
from n28.bullet.mail.scd.yahoo.com (n28.bullet.mail.scd.yahoo.com [209.73.160.85]) by blackexodus.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id
lAP4Rnie029809 for <fm@fathersmanifesto.net>; Sat, 24
Nov 2007 23:27:49 -0500 X-Orig:
n28.bullet.mail.scd.yahoo.com [209.73.160.85] X-Authentication-Warning:
blackexodus.us: h621364w owned process doing -bs Comment:
DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature:
a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=b5USngrXntf5RfkuxFRv2d4b1xCfIm+nCSn51/IxG+TroZKB8ZSbybDPNG/kBhweceEZtU4wAFN+sfUq+X29LO2UCVQMXQcCEzLWn1G2fUoAffpjRlmGWOWToaxlgiuH; Received:
from [66.218.69.3] by n28.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2007 04:27:48 -0000 Received:
from [66.218.66.96] by t3.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2007 04:27:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:
16843163-m10612 X-Sender:
ruthercap@earthlink.net X-Apparently-To:
Israelites@yahoogroups.com X-Received:
(qmail 65931 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2007 04:27:47 -0000 X-Received:
from unknown (66.218.67.94) by m56.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2007
04:27:47 -0000 X-Received:
from unknown (HELO elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.63) by mta15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2007
04:27:46 -0000 X-Received:
from [209.86.224.49] (helo=elwamui-sweet.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with
asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Iw95r-00068x-HK; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:43
-0500 X-Received:
from 209.188.50.230 by webmail.pas.earthlink.net with HTTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:43
-0500 Message-ID:
<14926738.1195964863449.JavaMail.root@elwamui-sweet.atl.sa.earthlink.net> To:
TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com, "'Jacob Israel'" <jk@jacobisrael.us>, TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com,
houseisrael@yahoogroups.com, Israelites@yahoogroups.com,
israeliteidentity@yahoogroups.com, hilloftorah@yahoogroups.com,
christiandentity@yahoogroups.com, identity@yahoogroups.com,
davidicke@yahoogroups.com, TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com,
thespiritofjacob@yahoogroups.com, christiandentity@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer:
EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0 X-ELNK-Trace:
3197ad4364ba1198fdcf5760238007a17e972de0d01da940af856a39abfd1eb782c283baefc42207350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP:
209.86.89.63 X-eGroups-Msg-Info:
1:12:0:0:0 From:
ruthercap@earthlink.net Sender:
Israelites@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version:
1.0 Mailing-List:
list Israelites@yahoogroups.com; contact Israelites-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To:
mailing list Israelites@yahoogroups.com List-Id:
<Israelites.yahoogroups.com> Precedence:
bulk List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:Israelites-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Date:
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:43 -0500 (EST) Subject:
[Israelites] Re: [TWOMIFTG] RE: CALLING ALL KIKES Reply-To:
Israelites@yahoogroups.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:
groups-email-ff-u Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="hP4GRuo9bakgpHbmapFVawWeo8JtDkEJg77yQHP" --hP4GRuo9bakgpHbmapFVawWeo8JtDkEJg77yQHP Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable First, I have never heard of it before. Since there is already a "Jewish Encyclopedia" that is published, I find it highly unlikely that ehre is ALSO a "Jewish STANDARD Encyclopedia." Second, it is YOU who is not the credible source. We have not seen what the Jewish Standard Encclopedia says. We have only seen YOUR LIES... ABOUT the Jewish Standard Encyclopedia. Jon Moseley
THIS is not something
CHRISTIANS or “nazis’ made up. This
is straight from the horse’s mouth. It’s
not CHRISTIANS who claim jews are edomites—it’s jews!! It’s not “anti-semitism” to quote
jew sources—IT’S TRUTH [and perhaps the first time we’ve found an actual
truth in a jew source, even if it’s a half truth] If such a jew historical
source will ADMIT that “from then on [Edomites] *constituted* a *part* of the jewish
people”, AND that “Herod [was] one
of their descendants”, then the TRUTH is far more revealing about, and far worse for,
the jew. How do we know this is a
half truth? The statement “[Edomites]
ceased to figure in Jewish history”
is patently false, because this IS ‘jewish history”, and Edomites STILL
“figure” in it—in fact, they’re the MAJOR figure, and they are the
MAJOR figure in this very publication. This would be about like
saying that Jacob/Israel no longer figures in our lives or history because he’s just
a dead old White man anyway, or Cain no longer figures in “jewish history”, even
though we know Edomites were from Cain. If
Edomites no longer “figure in jewish history”, then why do ALL jewish history
books talk about it, and LIE about it, and prevaricate about it, and spin it, and finally
DENY it? And how could Edomite
blood just disappear from the jew race? Did
they kill off all the ‘Edomite jews’ like Herod?
If they did, why don’t they just say so? If
they don’t say so, then they didn’t, which means that each jew today has at
least *some* Edomite blood in him. Why not
just be straightforward about it, rather than saying “[Edomites]
ceased to figure in Jewish history”. And why would it be only jews who claim that the
two verses in Scripture which state that God HATES Esau [their patriarch] do not really
mean “hate”, it means merely “loves less” unless they had some racial
affinity to Esau? The answer; jews ARE
Edomites. Edomites CREATED
Judaism, and they did it completely independently from Israelites. Both the Babylonian and
Jerusalem Talmuds were created by Edomites, not Israelites. The huge intellectual
gap between jews and Whites is not merely an ideological or religious or historical or
geographic gap—it’s a genetic gap. Note corrections below
in blue. From:
Israelites@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Israelites@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of ruthercap@earthlink.net NOw, READ THE PREVIOUS PARAGRAPHS. THE ARTICLE IS
EXPLICIT THAT THE IDUMEANS (EDOMITES) WERE A SEPARATE KINGDOM, WHO WERE PART OF ISRAEL,
BECAUSE THEY WERE UNDER ISRAELI RULE -- NOT AS PART OF THE SAME PEOPLE. “Israelis’ are jews are Edomites.
Israelites are NOT jews are not Edomites. Yes, there were two kingdoms: Israelites,
and Edomite jews. AND THE ARTICLE
IS EXPLICIT THAT INTER-MARRIAGE WAS PROHIBITED. This article says NOTHING about marriage, intermarriage, or
intermingling. It says ONLY that “from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish
people, Herod being one of their descendants”. Now we know why Edomite jews can’t even read Christian
sources: they can’t even read their own jew sources, and not even a jew is willing to
tell another jew [or to stand with you and make themselves look as STUPID as he now
looks]. YOU said the quote: “…from then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a
part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants.
"EDOM (Idumea)," The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY:
Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589”
is not there, BUT WE PROVED THAT IT IS THERE. HOW EXACTLY CAN ”from then on”
EDOMITES “constitute[] a part of the
Jewish people” WITHOUT INTERMARRYING WITH JEWISH
PEOPLE? If they are *PART* of the filthy kikes, BY DEFINITION they intermarried with
filthy kikes, this article says NOTHING contrarywise, and your *only* source for this is
your “head” [though we use that term loosely]. For simply quoting a jew source, this Edomite jew called us
liars. We PROVED the quote was LEGITIMATE, and now he complains “instead of proving your point yourself’ we quote jew sources. If anyone LIED, it was not us, it was Edomite jew source
[which we don’t believe anyway, because there’s NOTHING from an Edomite jew
that’s ever been honest or accurate anyway]. It was YOUR assertion, not OUR assertion, that this jew
source did NOT say “…from
then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod
[King of Judea] being one of their descendants. "EDOM (Idumea)," The New
Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589’. It was YOUR assertion which was a LIE—or at least
a profound plague of ignorance. It’s not a matter of being “RIGHT BY DEFAULT’!
It’s a matter of being called a LIAR for quoting, ACCURATELY, their OWN
sources. It’s a matter now of their abject inability to comprehend the written
word, even a written word phrased by their OWN tribe. It’s a matter of THEIR
believing that their own filthy thoughts and culture of death are more credible than their
OWN tribe’s writings [whch are rarely honest or accurate anyway]. It’s a
matter of cognitive dissonance—they “think” we will “trust” their
“minds”and reject their OWN tribe’s WRITTEN statements even years after
they’ve proven to be STUPID, ignorant, arrogant, vain, DISHONEST, psychotic, and
paranoid. |
               |
|
Modified Wednesday, December 03, 2008 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |
