Race

Gould's most inflammatory allegation consists of blaming IQ testers for magnifying the toll of those lost in the Holocaust (p. 263). Here he has followed the lead of Leon Kamin's (1974) The Science and Politics of IQ. The Kamin-Gould thesis is that early IQ testers claimed their research proved that Jews as a group scored low on their tests and that this finding was then conveniently used to support passage of the restrictive Immigration Act of 1924 which then denied entry to hapless Jewish refugees in the 1930s. Gould goes so far as to claim (1996, pp. 195-198; 255-258) that Henry H. Goddard (in 1917) and Carl C. Brigham (in 1923) labeled four-fifths of Jewish immigrants as "feeble-minded ... morons".

It is you who have stood by me in my trials; and I confer a kingdom on you, just as my Father has conferred one on me, that you may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom; and you will sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. "Simon, Simon, behold Satan has demanded to sift all of you like wheat," Luke 22:28-31

"Tribes" is the Greek word "phule" which means "an offshoot; i.e., a race or clan".

This is the book of the generations of Adam: In the day that God created man. He made him in the likeness of God. Gen 5:1

Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws. Gen 26:5

Be sure of this, that no fornicator or impure man, or one who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God Ephesians 5:5

A human hair can be associated with a particular racial group based on established models for each group. Forensic examiners differentiate between hairs of Caucasoid (European ancestry), Mongoloid (Asian ancestry), and Negroid (African ancestry) origin, all of which exhibit microscopic characteristics that distinguish one racial group from another.

Head hairs are generally considered best for determining race, although hairs from other body areas can be useful. Racial determination from the microscopic examination of head hairs from infants, however, can be difficult, and hairs from individuals of mixed racial ancestry may possess microscopic characteristics attributed to more than one racial group.

The identification of race is most useful as an investigative tool, but it can also be an associative tool when an individual's hairs exhibit unusual racial characteristics.

'You see I am one of those people described as "nearly white" and I know the unhappiness of our kind. I therefore think it is a sin to bring people into the world who are burdened with complexes [the consequences of race mixing] which in turn give rise to positive anguish to their extremely sensitive minds. I believe it to be the work of the devil, and have been praying for a long time that God would reveal this fact to the world. I shall continue to pray for you and all those who believe in keeping the races as God made them and I hope that you will pray for us who have been so sinned against.

'We try to forget it but it remains like a hidden cancer in our minds... There is a lot that needs to be disclosed concerning the mind of the "Imperfect Race" of half breeds. One thing they do know ï¿½ is that it is not true that blacks and whites are equal.'

The Statistical Handbook on the American Family from the National Opinion Research Center reports that, compared to White men, black men are:

This is evidence of a very big difference between races which has serious consequences for society as a whole. The pop theory that these racial differences are due to socialization or environment are now scientifically disputed by the accuracy of the various methods by which to measure cranial capacity, or what the differences between races and sexes are, or how to compensate for various physical factors which influence cranial capacity: the races are designed differently.

The proportional differences between races and sexes are equivalent from test to test (helmet size, external head measurement, length plus width of the head, and various methods for measuring the internal cranial capacity) which is proof enough that there are distinct differences between race and sex. J. Philippe Rushton's most recent calculations for cranial volumes of East Asians, Europeans, and Africans of 1,415, 1,362, and 1,268 cc's, respectively, excludes the measurement by sex, so assumptions must be made from other observations which show that the cranial capacity of men is an average of 8-18% larger than that for women. Once adjusted by sex, his figures correlate well with GRE scores (Quantitative, Verbal, and Analytical), TIMSS and TIMSS-R scores, IAEP scores, and in international and US incomes.

While test scores, incomes, and some crime rates are available separately for Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Other Hispanics, jews, and Indians, brain sizes are not available separately, so these other factors are interpolated to estimate where on the curve they would fall relative to their known traits. Test scores for jews in the US are not reported separately, so the TIMSS test scores for Israel, who are mostly jews, are used to calculate their expected brain size. Brain sizes for White Europeans, East Asians, and Africans are well known, but those for Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, Indians, Other Hispanics, and Others are not, so their expected brain sizes are extrapolated from their separate GRE, SAT, ACT, and TIMSS scores, annual incomes, and known crime rates. The brain sizes of Other Hispanics, Puerto Ricans, and Mexicans are so different that it's extremely misleading to include them as one category in any measurement. Conversely, the similarity between Indians, Mexicans, and jews is so close that it just can't be a coincidence--they are all apparently one single race. While the differences between Asians, Europeans, and Africans have gotten much press and statistical reporting, the possibility that Indians, Mexicans and jews are all one race has gotten absolutely no media coverage.

Once brain sizes are known, the amazingly high degree of correlation between that and IQs, test scores, crime rates, and incomes becomes evident.

BLACKS AND CRIME: Blacks are 12.1% of the US population, while American Indians and Asians together are 3.5%. Thus, the FBI's "Whites" [Includes Mexicans, Arabs, Jews, etc.] are the remaining 84.4% of the population.. Blacks are 5.6 times as likely to commit violent crimes as are "Whites." In other words, the average Black is 460% more likely to attack someone than the average "White" is. As compared to "Whites," Blacks are 4.5 times as likely to rape, 5.2 times as likely to commit aggravated assault, and 10.3 times as likely to commit armed robbery. If you had read that Blacks were 30% more likely to be armed robbers than "Whites," you might not have been surprised. In fact, Blacks are 930% more likely to be armed robbers. The 12% of the US population that is Black commits 58% of the armed robberies.

In 1996 law enforcement agencies reported to the FBI that they arrested 14,439 murderers. Of these murderers, 7,928 or 55% were Black. The murderer rate for Blacks is more than 26 per 100,000, while the "White" rate is less than 3 per 100,000. A Black is 9 times as likely to murder as a "White" is.
HISPANIC CRIME IS HIGH: Recall that we said that what the FBI calls "Whites" is really a conglomeration of Whites, Hispanics, and others. For data on Hispanic crime, we can look at the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Report, which lists the actual data submitted by 10,000 law enforcement agencies before it is sanitized by the FBI. Five of the states-Arizona, California, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Texas-still keep track of Hispanic crime as a separate category. In one year in these five states, we find under murderers: 1,156 Whites, 2,015 Hispanics, 1,526 Blacks, 134 Asians, and 54 Indians. Adjusted for population, Hispanics are 4.8 times as likely to murder as real Whites are, Blacks are 10 times as likely to murder, and Indians twice as likely as to murder. Before we leave the subject of Hispanics, let us briefly mention what the California Department of Justice reports about murder and robbery. Of the 2,644 California murderers in 1995, 18% or 467 were White. California had 1,250 Hispanic murderers and 794 Black murderers. This data shows that in California, as compared to a White, a Hispanic is 6.1 times as likely to murder, and a Black is 13.2 times as likely to murder.

A California Hispanic is more than 5 times as likely to commit armed robbery as a White, and a Black is nearly 20 times as likely to be an armed robber as a White.

BLACK WOMEN AND MURDER: Removing Hispanics from the FBI's "White" category exposes another interesting fact. In the five states keeping track of Hispanic crime, we found that Black women are actually 5% more likely to murder than White men are. This is also true in almost all parts of the US where separate data is kept on Hispanics or where there are too few Hispanics to obscure the data. For example in seven Southern states, Black women are 15% more likely to murder than White men are.

Since we said that in the South, Black women are 15% more likely to murder than White men are, to be fair we must compare White women to Black men. In these same seven Southern states, a Black man is 52 times more likely to murder than a White woman is. Stated as a percentage, a Black man is 5200% more likely to murder than a White woman is.
OUTSIDE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS THE FBI DATA: Professor Levin [in his 1997 book, "Why Race Matters: Race Differences and What They Mean"] reviews some of the statistics on Black criminals that you may have heard. For example, a Black is 7.8 times as likely to be in prison as a "White." Over 30% of the Black men between 23 and 29 are imprisoned for a felony. In major cities, it is worse. At any one time 42% of the Black males in Washington DC are in jail, on parole, on probation, or being sought by police. In Detroit, the number is somewhere between 45% and 50%. In Baltimore, it is 56%. Another study found that in one year, 25% of the Black men in Little Rock, Arkansas were arrested for a felony. Yet, another study shows that in the District of Columbia, 85% of the Black males will be arrested at some point in their life.
INTERRACIAL CRIME: Perhaps the best place to look at interracial crime is in the South, because the media depicts the South's Whites as a bunch of violent gun-toting, Black-hating rednecks. In one year in seven Southern states, Blacks killed 226 Whites while Whites killed only 66 Blacks. After adjusting the data for population size, it shows that a southern Black is 11.2 times as likely to murder as a southern White is. Table 2.8 of the FBI's 1996 Uniform Crime Report, lists interracial crime figures for the US as a whole. It shows that adjusted for population size, a Black is nearly 16 times as likely to murder a "White," than visa versa.

Here are some of the results cited in the university studies reviewed by Dr. Levin. Note that we don't know how each researcher defined White. One study shows that in the South, a Black is 10 times more likely to murder a White than visa-versa. A second study demonstrates that proportionally, Blacks kill 22 times as many Whites as Whites kill Blacks. A third study shows that Blacks are about 11 times more likely to rape a White than a White is to rape a Black. He concludes that evidence exists to support the stereotype that Black men lust after White women.

Professor Levin cites additional research showing that less than 3% of White crime is directed against Blacks, while one-half to two-thirds of the Black wave crime is directed against Whites. In yet another study, he found that the average Black is 25 times more likely to assault a White than the average White is likely to assault a Black.

"Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote in message
news:vb4lou440cptd3gche79p9k2mkps7342l8@4ax.com...
> "John Knight" <jwknight@polbox.com> wrote:
> >> Nonsense. There is no gene that "gravitates someone towards a book".
> >> It is not transmittible by descent.
> >
> >Only the race called jews adhere to, accept, practice, believe in, promote,
> >and promulgate the "principles" of the Talmud
>
> duh Why would that be? I wonder. It is part of their culture
>
> >But on TOP of that, the definition for "race" that YOU provided states
> >clearly that a "race" is "a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to
> >the same stock".
>
> That is ONE meaning of race. Not all usages of race fit that
> definition. Indeed most of them don't. Go learn how to use a
> dictionary properly.
>

You've claimed for a long time that jews are not a race.

Now you're arguing just as vehemently that they are a race by only ONE
definition of race?

Then you suggest someone else should go "use a dictionary properly"?

YOU provided this dictionary definition. Nobody challenged it, not even
YOU. By at least ONE definition that you posted, jews are a RACE.

But you STILL deny jews are a race based on the assertion that jews don't
fit EVERY definition of "race"?

No wonder "liberals" don't have the first clue about the world they live in.

Just to set the record straight, here again is the definition of race that
YOU provided:

>I have no idea what dictionary you pulled this from. Here is
>Mirriam-Webster:
>Main Entry: 3race
>Function: noun
>Etymology: Middle French, generation, from Old Italian razza
>Date: 1580
>1 : a breeding stock of animals
>2 a : a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock b
> : a class or kind of people unified by community of interests,
> habits, or characteristics <the English race>
>3 a : an actually or potentially interbreeding group within a species;
> also : a taxonomic category (as a subspecies) representing such a
> group b : BREED c : a division of mankind possessing traits that are
> transmissible by descent and sufficient to characterize it as a
> distinct human type

You have finally agreed that jews are a race by claiming that they are an
"ethnos" [which is simply Greek for race].

But jews are also a race because they are "a family belonging to the same
stock", "a tribe belonging to the same stock", "a people belonging to the
same stock", and now "a nation belonging to the same stock", "a class or
kind of people unified by community of interests, habits,
[AND]characteristics", "an actually or potentially interbreeding group
within a species", AND "a division of mankind possessing traits that are
transmissible by descent and sufficient to characterize it as a distinct
human type".

Every single one of these definitions for race fit the jews to a tee.