|
|
|
Etymology of "Racism"
In the entire Holy Bible, the phrase or concept of "racism" is not mentioned even once. Instead are God's commandments and statutes prohibiting the mixing of the holy seed with the peoples of the lands. As late as 1945, dictionaries like The New Century Dictionary also didn't have a definition for "racism", or "racist". Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989 racism [f. RACE sb.2 + -ISM; cf. F. racisme (Robert 1935).] a. The theory that distinctive human characteristics and abilities are determined by race. b = RACIALISM. 1936 L. Dennis Coming Amer. Fascism 109 If .. it be assumed that one of our values should be a type of racism which excludes certain races from citizenship, then the plan of execution should provide for the annihilation, deportization, or sterilization of the excluded races.
racist ('reisist), sb. and a. [f. RACE sb.2 + -ist.] A. sb. = RACIALIST sb. 1932 M. Eastman tr. Trotsky's Hist. Russ. Revol. i. 27 This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelation of the 'Racists'. 1934 H. G. Wells Exper. Autobiogr. I iii. 107 So much for the Hitlerite stage of my development, when I was a sentimentalist, a moralist, a patriot, a racist. New Century Dictionary
It was Webster's Dictionary which appears to be the first dictionary to include this concept in the English lexicon. Their first definition wasn't nearly as vitriolic as the latter ones:
But then as jews like Noah Webster felt more comfortable about the unlikelihood of the visitors called jews of being expelled as they've been 86 times before us, Webster's definition got more vitriolic:
Now, rather than just meaning "prejudice", this relatively mild word is displaced with with a "program" which is based on "persecution and domination".
Similarly, the words "sexism" and "sexist" are not to be found anywhere in the entire Scripture, and also were not in the 1945 edition of the New Century Dictionary:
But Webster went right for the jugular this time and pronounced that sexism was:
Now we get to the nitty gritty. It's with his new concept of "anti-semitism" that Noah Webster reveals his not so hidden agenda. New Century Dictionary defines "anti-semitism" as "one hostile to the jews", but Noah makes this giant leap of faith "disliking or fearing Jews and Jewish things". The concept of "anti-semitism" is not mentioned even ONCE in the entire Holy Bible. "Fear of the jews" is mentioned numerous times, yet New Century Dictionary doesn't include this as a part of its definition. Being hostile to the jews is an antonym to fearing them. How can one phrase have such contradictory definitions as "hostile to" and "fear of"? And why does Webster's definition suddenly add "jewish things", a concept not mentioned by Century NOR Scripture?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racist <<<United Nations uses a definition of racist discrimination laid out in the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and adopted in 1966:
"Reverse" Racism by Governor Gilmore 77% of Americans support NOFEAR and DISAGREE with racist anti-White "leaders" like Gov. Gilmore
Where does racial pride end and racism begin?
If he believes it's right to insult an organization which represents Americans of European descent who represent almost three quarters of his constituents, then he MUST insult other "racist" organizations "equally". He MUST rescind any and all support for the jewish Anti-defamation League (ADL). This is the most *racist* organization of them all, and they represent only 1.9% of Americans. He MUST rescind any and all support for the National Organization of Women (N.O.W.), as the most worthless, biased, and destructive organization on the planet, who represent only 2% of Americans.. Could this governor be at all surprised to discover that 77% of his own constituents agreed with his original proclamation and disagreed with his rescinding it? Only 73.9% of Virginia's population are White, which means that 3.1% who support NOFEAR are either Blacks (who are 20.4% of the population), Asians (4.3%), or Other (2.7%). Furthermore, 4.7% of Virginia's population who are classified as White are actually Hispanic, which means that only 69.2% are Caucasian, making non-Caucasians 7.8% of those who support NOFEAR.
Is it possible that 20% of Blacks support NOFEAR, and thus make up 4% of that 7.8%? Or that half the Hispanics do, making up another 2.4%, and that the remaining 1.4% are mostly "Other"? If so, then exactly which minority group was the governor pandering to when he frustrated the will of three quarters of his constituents, became a traitor to his own race, and rescinded the proclamation? Certainly not the few percent who are Other, nor the few percent who are Hispanics who oppose NOFEAR, nor the few percent who are Asians? The main opposition he must have been intimidated by are the less than 18% who are Blacks who oppose NOFEAR. Since when, in this land of the free, home of the brave, did an 18% minority, an emotional minority which is still poorly educated and has been misled for decades by FALSE media hype, get to dictate such policies based solely on their race, or their perceived hate for another race, or their willingness to pretend that they're insulted when Whites display the same pride for their own race that Louis Farrakhan displays for his?
http://www.pilotonline.com/news/nw0511pro.html
Unwittingly, Gilmore OKs supremacists' history
month
Each year, the governor routinely signs hundreds of honorary resolutions at the request of civic groups. On Wednesday, he inked his name on an innocently worded decree declaring May ``European-American Heritage and History Month.''
Much to his horror on Thursday, Gilmore learned from reporters that the resolution was requested by the National Organization for European-American Rights, or NOFEAR, an anti-minority group led by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke of Louisiana. Gubernatorial aides said the proclamation slipped by them. One described Gilmore as ``quite angry'' about the incident. Gilmore issued a written statement voiding the proclamation. ``A simple mistake was made and I can assure you we will be more careful screening these types of requests during the remainder of my administration,'' he said. Gilmore denounced Duke for espousing ``racist attitudes'' and said Duke's organization ``masquerades as an advocacy group for diversity but preaches exclusion and hatred.'' ``My aims and goals as governor of Virginia are 180 degrees different from theirs,'' Gilmore added. Ron Doggett, president of the 300-member Virginia chapter of NOFEAR, issued a press release Thursday morning hailing the proclamation. His joy was short-lived. During an impromptu news conference outside the governor's office later in the day, he accused Gilmore of ``insulting all Virginians of European ancestry.'' Gilmore was quick to say that he has nothing against European Americans or appropriately celebrating their accomplishments. Reach Warren Fiske at (804) 697-1565 or fiske@richmond.infi.net
POLL
RESULTS Yes, because of the group that
sought it
|
               |
|
Modified Saturday, November 29, 2008 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |
17.17%
