More Proof of the Anti-Christ Nature of the
Catholic Church
"… it could prove extremely useful that
the general congregation reaffirm … especially … the pastoral care of
homosexual persons"
We have been warned, no, threatened, that if we don't seek
unity with all peoples, including Catholics of course, as well as jews, that we
cannot win this religious war. Our answer to that threat is that unity
with evil has never been in the cards for the House of
Israel
THE CHURCH IS FORBIDDEN FROM RE-INTERPRETING THE SCRIPTURES OR
BIBLICAL TRUTH
In Galatians 1, Paul writes that even if HE HIMSELF or an angel from heaven
preach any other gospel than the one written, LET HIM BE ETERNALLY CONDEMNED
NOWHERE does the scripture say that "The Church is empowered by Christ to act as
our interpreters and guides in matters relating to Holy Writ."
Marriage is a sin. (St. Augustine) Matrimony is impure and unholy, a means of sexual passion. (Origen) Marriage is a moral crime, more dreadful than any punishment or any
death...spurcitiae, obscenity, filth. (Tertullian) Marriage is corruption, a polluted and foul way of life. (Tatian) Marriage is a crime against God. Marriage is prostitution of the
members of Christ. Married people ought to blush at the state in which they
are living. (St. Ambrose) The primary purpose of a man of God is to cut down the wood of
marriage with the axe of virginity. (St.
Jerome)
Jesus taught everything publicly. And yet Catholics depend on things that
Jesus DID NOT teach publicly.
Then why didn't Jesus teach publicly --
o the divinity of His mother, despite teaching that NO ONE IS
GOOD. FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
o after teaching IN DETAIL how we are to pray, he never
mentioned that INSTEAD of what Jesus actually taught we should pray instead to
His earthly mother. FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
o that the Passover cup offered in remembrance of Him would now suddenly
require a priest, although the Passover never did before.
FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
o that after criticizing the central leadership of the Jewish religious
system, He was setting up exactly the same thing, a new centralized
bureaucracy,. FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
o despite calling Peter -- the first Pope -- SATAN and
criticizing Peter's lack of faith from time to time, that Peter would now speak
infallibly as the voice of God. FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
o despite being explicitly ASKED which
apostle was the greatest, and repeatedly invited to say, Jesus
criticized those who "LORD IT OVER" others, and NEVER said anything
about Peter being the leader of the church or the Apostolic succession from
Peter. FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
o after criticizing the Pharisees explicitly for adding their own
interpretations and traditions to contradict and undermine the explcit commands
and teachings of God, that the Christian church should commit exactly the same
sin. FUNNY JESUS NEVER MENTIONED THAT.
SO, IF JESUS TAUGHT EVERYTHING IN PUBLIC, WHERE DID ALL THIS PRIVATE
CATHOLIC TEACHING SNEAK IN???
Remember what Jesus DID teach:
God comes in through the front door.
Satan sneaks in through the window.
In my personal experience, I've never encountered such "cultified" Roman
Catholics as the ones on this list.
Straight out of the Dark Ages -- which they've never left behind.
UPDATE:
In Argentina, a former police chaplain
has been sentenced to life in prison for
torture, kidnapping and murder of dissidents during Argentina’s so-called ‘dirty-war.” Roman
Catholic priest Christian Von Wernich is the first clergy member to go on trial
for crimes committed by U.S.-backed military regimes in Latin America during the
1970s and 1980s. Outside the courtroom in the city of La Plata, crowds cheered
and set off firecrackers as the verdict was announced. Adriana Calvo, who was
detained under the Argentine junta, hailed the ruling.
St. Thomas More, who was martyred for the sanctity of
Marriage, pray for us.
Dina
In Boston, a devastating loss for marriage and the
Church
by Phil Lawler
special to CWNews.com
Boston, Jun. 14, 2007 (CWNews.com) - The fight is over
here in Massachusetts. We lost. Again.
Meeting in a constitutional convention on June 14, the
state legislature defeated a proposed constitutional
amendment that would have defined marriage as a union
between a man and a woman. That amendment-- the only
realistic hope for reversing a decision by the state's
highest court-- is now dead. Same-sex marriage is here
to stay.
Understand, now, that the pro-family movement did
not need a majority of the legislators' votes. Because
the "Marriage Amendment" had already been endorsed by
over 100,000 registered voters, the constitutional
process only required /one-fourth/ of the legislators
to support it, in order to put the proposal on the
ballot for a final statewide vote.
We needed just 50 votes. We held just 45.
In a legislature dominated by people who describe
themselves as Catholics, more than three-fourths voted
to scuttle the Christian conception of marriage, in
favor of a new definition concocted by four judges.
Just yesterday, friends who have been actively
lobbying the legislature told me that they were still
confident they could count 50 votes in favor of the
Marriage Amendment. But the pressure from Governor
Deval Patrick, the Democratic leadership, the mass
media, and the gay-rights lobby proved overwhelming. A
few lawmakers wavered, and soon the rout began.
How did it happen? As a longtime resident of
Massachusetts and a scarred veteran of the local
political wars, I think I can answer that
question.It's a simple matter, really. Unprincipled
politicians, like flowing water, will always follow
the path of least resistance. In this case,
the "easy" vote was a vote against marriage.
Any lawmaker who supported the Marriage Amendment
knew that he would pay a price for his vote. He would
face the wrath of the legislative
leadership. He would be a target for angry
editorials, and the butt of jokes on talk-radio shows.
Gay-rights groups might picket his office
or his home; they would surely support his opponent
in the next election.
Those who /opposed/ the amendment, on the other
hand, had nothing to fear but the disappointment of
their constituents. There would be no
angry editorials, because no influential newspaper
in Boston was behind the Marriage Amendment. Many
voters will be unhappy with their
elected representatives, but the next election is
almost 17 months away; the furor will have died down
long before the campaign season.
As always in Massachusetts, the balance of political
forces was severely skewed. Governor Patrick and the
Democratic Party leadership were openly promising
rewards for votes against the Marriage
Amendment. The tiny Republican Party was essentially
neutral. The influential /Boston Globe/ hammered away
in support of same-sex marriage; the ineffectual
/Boston Herald/ hoped that the issue would go away.
Most important of all, the Catholic Church-- which
once dominated Massachusetts politics-- was missing
from this political battle.
Oh, I don't mean to suggest that the hierarchy was
silent. There were several strong statements from the
bishops of Massachusetts, with the
most recent
http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=5176
coming on the eve of the fateful June 14 vote. But
those statements never translated into concrete
action. The bishops did not name names
and demand action from specific politicians. Most
Catholic pastors declined to be actively involved in
the signature-gathering campaign for the Marriage
Amendment; most Catholic priests didn't even sign the
petitions.
Legislators never had any reason to fear that if
they voted to support same-sex marriage, they would be
called /personally/ to account by
their Church leaders. Many of the lawmakers who
voted to kill the Marriage Amendment today will be at
Mass on Sunday, shaking hands with
their pastors. If any Catholic cleric in
Massachusetts has actually said that it would be
morally wrong-- sinful-- to support same-sex
marriage, I missed that statement.
The Church in Massachusetts has been gravely
weakened by the sex-abuse crisis. But the recent
troubles of the Boston archdiocese do not fully
explain this failure of Catholic political power in
2007. Massachusetts was already a bastion of
liberalism--a stronghold of legal abortion, a pioneer
in embryo research--before the explosion of
the sex-abuse scandal in Boston.
Today's vote in the Massachusetts legislature was
the culmination of a process that has visible for
years: the steady of erosion of Catholic
public influence. For the past generation
Catholicism has been in retreat in Massachusetts,
ducking public battles for fear of a painful
loss. But political power is like any other kind of
muscle: If you don't use it, you lose it.
We lost the vote today, but we lost the influence a
long time ago. In a state where nearly 50% of the
voters are Catholic, the legislature
has endorsed a conception of marriage that is
completely alien to the Christian understanding. This
is a devastating loss for Catholicism in
Massachusetts. In theory, we could make another effort
to amendment the state constitution and restore a
coherent legal understanding of marriage.
But the process is a long and difficult one; a new
citizens' initiative could not be approved until 2012
at the earliest.
And it would be foolish to ignore the reality that
the tide is running against us. In another year or
two-- or maybe five or ten years, but
inevitably the time will come-- the state
legislature will face another test vote on another key
moral issue. Unless Catholics take
action to reverse the trend, we can expect to lose
that vote as well. If we don't have a plan to restore
Catholic influence in Massachusetts, we can only plan
for surrender.
Suing the Vatican Insurance Official Charges Racketeering
Lynda Edwards The Associated Press
J A C K S O N, Miss., July 6, 2004 �� The torching of financier Martin Frankel's $3
million mansion in Greenwich, Conn., was meant to destroy evidence of an insurance scam
that cost Mississippi and other states millions, police said. But not everything went up
in flames.
Firefighters searching the rubble found Frankel's pornographic videos, jewel-encrusted
mobile phones, Ouija board and "Things to Do List." No. 1 was: "Launder
more money NOW."
The financier, who initially fled to Europe, was extradited and pleaded guilty in 2002
in Mississippi to stealing $208 million in five states.
But that did not end the case for Mississippi Insurance Commissioner George Dale.
Trail Leads to Vatican
While unraveling Frankel's web of trickery, Dale found a thread that led into the
secretive halls of the Vatican. And he is determined to follow it, even though, as he
says, "This step meant some soul searching."
In a lawsuit Dale filed, which is moving toward a jury trial in U.S. District Court in
Jackson, he claims Vatican officials violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations (RICO) Act. Damages, if Dale prevails, could be more than $600 million.
A Vatican spokesman denies the Roman Catholic church profited from business dealings
with Frankel or accepted funds he stole. The church has filed a motion to dismiss the suit
for lack of jurisdiction, and a ruling is expected this summer.
Dale remains determined to pursue his suit against "The Holy See aka Vatican City
State" and others.
"The evidence of wrongdoing my investigators accumulated was so clear," he
says. "State officials are always slammed as paper pushers. But two federal agencies
fumbled the ball with Frankel. The Internal Revenue Service approved Frankel's taxes. The
FBI had suspicions but made no moves. In the end, insurance commissioners brought this guy
down."
Just days before Frankel's mansion burned in 1999, he and his associates were summoned
by Dale to Jackson to discuss a possible tie between Vatican officials and the insurance
scam. Frankel didn't show.
20-January-2008 -- Catholic World News Brief
Pope Prods Jesuits on Loyalty to Church
Vatican, Jan. 18, 2008 (CWNews.com) - In a message to the 35th general
convention of the Society of Jesus, Pope Benedict XVI has called for a revival
of traditional Jesuit loyalty to the Catholic faith and the Holy See.
"I heartily hope that the present congregation affirms with clarity the
authentic charism of the Founder so as to encourage all Jesuits to promote true
and healthy Catholic doctrine," the Holy Father wrote in a message to the 225
Jesuit delegates meeting in Rome. The Pope's letter was dated January 10, but
made public on January 18, the day before the general congregation was scheduled
to elect a new superior general.
Pope Benedict called the Society of Jesus to a "renewed ascetic and apostolic
impulse." In more specific terms he suggested that:
… it could prove extremely useful that the general congregation reaffirm, in the
spirit of St. Ignatius, its own total adhesion to Catholic doctrine, in
particular on those neuralgic points which today are strongly attacked by
secular culture, as for example the relationship between Christ and religions;
some aspects of the theology of liberation; and various points of sexual
morality, especially as regards the indissolubility of marriage and the pastoral
care of homosexual persons.
The Pope also reminded the delegates of the special loyalty that Jesuits owe to
the Holy See, confirmed "in a vow of immediate obedience to the successor of
Peter." That loyalty is urgently needed today, he said, to help preach the
Gospel message faithfully to a society "distracted by many discordant voices."
Pope Benedict offered his "most heartfelt gratitude" to the outgoing Jesuit
superior, Father Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, for nearly 25 years of leadership. He
also thanked all of the Jesuits who have worked faithfully for the Church. He
promised his prayers for the success of the general congregation and the future
of the Jesuit order.
Modified
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers'
Manifesto & Christian Party
