|
|
Ron Paul For President
100% of the people I know on the internet, support Ron Paul.
100%, not 99%, of the people I know personally support Ron Paul, unless they
just haven’t heard of him—which is now down to only a few percent.
BEFORE the jews who run the media selected the three stooges (Obama, Hillary,
and McCain [literally Son of CAIN]) as our “presidential candidates”, they were
LUCKY to win 4%, and usually won only ONE PERCENT, of the popular vote as
reflected by internet and media polls, while Ron Paul walked away with 50-93%.
This is NOT how the Constitution works.
It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for alien enemy foreign jews to take control of
our communications channels, establish themselves as the fourth branch of
government, and take 100% control of the other three branches.
IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The only
legitimate, qualified, popular, constitutional candidate is Ron Paul, and by our
LAW, he MUST be president. Nobody
else can LEGALLY take that office.
We are a nation of law, not jews, not emotion, not sound bytes, not media
hysteria, and not rule by alien enemy foreign agents.
The following is our law and has been for 5,000 years:
When thou art come unto the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, and shalt
possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me,
like as all the nations that are about
me; Thou shalt in any wise set him king
over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one
from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a
stranger over thee, which
is not thy brother.
Deuteronomy 17:14-15
Some IDIOT on Hannity and Colmes on
October 21, 2007, referred to Ron Paul as "certifiably insane", the
ONLY reference on this MISERABLE "show" to Dr. Paul
You MUST see this video of Mark Larsen dressing DOWN Bitch Romney! A CLASSIC!! When Ron Paul is EXCLUDED
from a poll, as he was in three "mainstream media" polls like the WBZ poll, joos like Giuliani get 23% of the vote,
pro-anti-abortion Romney gets 23%, and Manchurian candidate McCain gets
15%. BUT, when Ron Paul IS included, as he was in
14 other objective internet-based polls around the nation[where he received an
average of 59% of the vote], the joo is lucky to get 8%, abortionist Romney is
lucky to get 10%, and long lost Manchurian candidate McCain is lucky to get ONE
PERCENT. Let’s be candid
here. The news media does NOT
represent American public opinion on ANY issue, in ANY manner. Every mediot is marching to the beat of
a drum which is the precise antonym to real American ideals particularly when
it comes to the Constitutional principles supported by Dr. Paul.
Counting both
Democrats and Republicans, Ron Paul gets 72% of vote, Jan. 5, 2007 in Colorado,
hitlery and jooliani both get 4%: http://apps.postindependent.com/pi_polls/index.php?op=results&pollID=145
Ron
Paul wins 87% of the 2,745 votes on the CNN poll on the Florida
debate You Poll Who won the CNN Youtube Republican Debate in Florida? Fred Thompson 0.6% Rudy Giuliani 1.1% Mike Huckabee 5.8% Duncan Hunter 1.2% John McCain 1.7% Ron Paul 87% Mitt Romney 1.5% Tom Tancredo 0.8% You voted: Ron Paul
Not a single one of
these CNN “strategists” understood a THING about politics, much
less mainstream American opinion.
Schneider and Begala thought Giuliani won the debate but only 11% of
their *own* audience agreed with them.
By what process have they been SO MISLED about reality? How can a tv set make them this STUPID? Holmes
was even worse off, picking McCain when 6 TIMES as many out of her own audience
picked Ron Paul. They couldn’t
even pick the best one-liners correctly.
Begala struck out twice, picking two candidates who combined ranked
almost lower than Ron Paul, Schneider picked McCain who less than 9% agreed
with, and Begala picked Tancredo who, while he performed better in this
category than McCain, received a quarter as many votes as Ron Paul. Can it get worse? Yup. NONE of these “strategists”
picked Giuliani as showing the worst performance, while a third of their
audience DID. In such an important
category, Schneider just horsed around by picking Bush who wasn’t even in
the debate, Begala picked Thompson who only 10% agreed with, and Holmes picked
Romney who only 17% agreed with. If you set out to
intentionally select answers which would be just the opposite of the actual
answers, could you do worse than these “strategists”? It’s hard to imagine how,
isn’t it? Instead of horsing
around, Schneider could have decided that the worse performance came from
Duncan Hunter or Jim Gilmore or Mike Huckabee, as each of them received less
than 2%. They all three could have
voted that the winner of the debate was either Tommy Thompson or Jim Gilmore,
as a statistical zero percent selected them in this category. But as an overall resounding antonym to
public opinion, their choices were perfect.
Poll Shows Obama & Edwards Rallying in NH
11/28/2007
With
the New Hampshire presidential primaries just six weeks away, Hillary
Clinton’s lead over Barack Obama and John Edwards is shrinking, while
Republican front-runner Mitt Romney appears secure, according to a
7NEWS-Suffolk University poll. Likely
voters in the Democratic Primary, which includes independents, gave 34 percent
support to Hillary Clinton, while 22 percent chose Barack Obama. Just 12
percent were undecided. However, in a June 2007 7NEWS/Suffolk University
poll, Clinton led Obama by 18 points compared to her 12-point spread today. Republican primary
Mitt
Romney (34 percent) topped Rudy Giuliani (20 percent), followed by John McCain
(13 percent), Ron Paul (8 percent), and Mike Huckabee (7 percent), with 14
percent undecided. In
the June 2007 7NEWS/Suffolk University poll, Romney had led Giuliani by four
points, as opposed to fourteen points today. In the meantime, Fred
Thompson, who polled 13 percent support in June, only garnered 2 percent in
this poll. “The
dynamics are different on the Republican side,” said Paleologos.
“Romney’s up; Giuliani’s down; McCain’s flat; Thompson
is toast; and Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee are trying to break into double
digits.” Another
sign of Romney’s strength: When likely Republican voters were asked which
Presidential candidate they would trust to drive their children to school, 25
percent picked Romney; 17 percent chose McCain; 9 percent, Huckabee; and only 7
percent indicated Giuliani. Choices not set in stone
Nearly
half of likely voters from both parties said that they may change their minds
before Jan. 8, 2008. Eleven percent were “very likely to
change their mind,” and 38 percent were “somewhat likely.” The
poll also reveals some similarities among New Hampshire voters of both parties,
such as:
About the poll
The 7NEWS-Suffolk University poll was conducted from Nov. 25
to Nov. 27, 2007. The margin of error is for each party subsample of 300
respondents is +/- 5.65 percent at a 95 percent level of confidence. The
600 respondent margin of error is +/- 4.00 percent. All respondents were
likely primary voters in the New Hampshire presidential primary on Jan. 8,
2008. Marginals and 455 pages of cross-tabulation data are
available. For more information, please contact David Paleologos,
director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, at 781-290-9310. We MUST ask, and we MUST GET ANSWERS,
about how they are an order of magnitude off on the Ron Paul figure [an average
of 59% for Ron Paul on the above polls, vs. only 5%]!! It’s not internet-based polls
which are wrong, or which don’t reflect American public opinion
accurately—it’s the jew-controlled “media”polls which
are!
|
               |
|
Modified Friday, July 04, 2008 Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |
