Abolishing the Supreme Court

"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember it or overthrow it." Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861 (1809-1865)

"That to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical", Thomas Jefferson in his most cherished document Sorry, your browser is not Java-enabled, you will not be able to chat.

"If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. ... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of its own existence." U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, 1928 (Olmstead v. United States)

Our brilliant philosopher Sandra Day O'Connor of our current Supreme Court wrote in 1993 http://laws.findlaw.com/US/506/263.html "See Bradwell v. State, 16 Wall. 130 (1873). The reasoning of the concurring Justices surely evidenced invidious animus, even though it rested on traditional views about a woman's place in society, rather than on overt hostility toward women. These Justices wrote:

"[T]he civil law, as well as nature herself, has always recognized a wide difference in the respective spheres and destinies of man and woman. Man is, or should be, woman's protector and defender. The natural and [506 U.S. 263, 320] proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life. The constitution of the family organization, which is founded in the divine ordinance, as well as in the nature of things, indicates the domestic sphere as that which properly belongs to the domain and functions of womanhood. The harmony, not to say identity, of interests and views which belong, or should belong, to the family institution is repugnant to the idea of a woman adopting a distinct and independent career from that of her husband. So firmly fixed was this sentiment in the founders of the common law that it became a maxim of that system of jurisprudence that a woman had no legal existence separate from her husband, who was regarded as her head and representative in the social state; and, notwithstanding some recent modifications of this civil status, many of the special rules of law flowing from and dependent upon this cardinal principle still exist in full force in most States. One of these is that a married woman is incapable, without her husband's consent, of making contracts which shall be binding on her or him. . . .

". . . The paramount destiny and mission of woman are to fulfil the noble and benign offices of wife and mother. This is the law of the Creator." Id., at 141 (Bradley, J., joined by Swayne and Field, JJ., concurring in judgment).

The Justices who subscribed to those views were certainly not misogynists, but their basic attitude - or animus - toward women is appropriately characterized as 'invidiously discriminatory.'"

Sandra, you're a fool! You are an utterly stupid woman. Not even the world's once best education system can hide that fact. You are incapable of understanding what society is all about, how the family is CRUCIAL to the survival of the Constitution YOU are supposed to be upholding, nor the role you personally played in destroying a woman's most important benefit and contribution to society--marriage.

Because of you, men have lost faith in the nation's system of laws, of their federal government, and of your court. Because of you, 12 million reasonable American men who would have been married otherwise have avoided that commitment and failed to form 12 million families. Because these 12 million families weren't formed, 12 million American women remain unmarried today & are subject to an array of social pathologies & a 2-6 fold increase in their rates of mortality.

If there is anyone who is 'invidiously discriminatory' it is you yourself.

It is not the citizenry's fault that you can't understand the God-given role of women--it is your fault. It is not the citizenry's fault that you are twisting their Constitution into a pretzel--it is your fault. It is not the failing of the citizenry which led to our current social pathologies--it is your failing. It is not the citizenry's fault that we scored DEAD LAST in education--it is your fault.

The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry legalized abortions which two thirds oppose, half view as murder, and seventeen out of twenty view as an affront to God, Christianity and free exercise of religion.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry affirmative action which is opposed by 84% of whites and 76% of blacks.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry welfare, even though 97.7% believe federal government is too big and less than one third believe government should "help the poor".
The United States Supreme Court denies the citizenry school prayer even though 85% of North Americans who are Christians and 90% of Americans who pray weekly want their children to be able to pray in school.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry the Equal Pay Act even though intelligent Americans know that this is 180 degrees out of synch with free enterprise principles.
The United States Supreme Court denies the citizenry its Second Amendment right to bear arms with 20,000 Unconstutional gun control laws, even though more than half of men and a quarter of women oppose gun control, and the Constitution still says "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The United States Supreme Court denies of the citizenry private property rights and Personal Savings by allowing government spending to exceed 42 cents of each wage dollar, leaving LESS than zero for family savings and putting each American household $77,000 in debt.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry "equal protection" for women, violating the core religious principles of the 85% of North Americans who are Christians, Congress never intended it to apply to women, it did not for almost a century before Reed v. Reed.
The United States Supreme Court denies the citizenry the ability to uphold adultery laws which is a serious violation of the Ten Commandments, prevents enforcement of laws which were never repealed, 84% of citizenry believe the existing laws should be upheld, and nine out of ten condemn adultery.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry capital punishment, even though most industrialized nations have outlawed it, we are on Amnesty International's hit list of violators of human rights because of it, and 29 innocent men have already been executed.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry a 40% rate of fatherlessness, even though four out of five believe it is the most significant social problem of the century, it is cited as most important problem facing the country, and three out of four believe it contributed to Littleton Shooting.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry Nineteenth Amendment "rights" to a minority of citizens while violating the First Amendment rights of the majority, which rendered the male vote ineffective.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry CAPTA which enabled false accusations of child abuse to destroy families and failed to curb "child abuse" and was followed by a 28 fold increase in false accusations of child sexual abuse.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry rape shield Laws & the rape trauma syndrome which empowered unscrupulous women to use false rape accusations against husbands and ex-boyfriends.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry a drinking & driving campaign even though NHTSA data shows that the non-drinking driver is the most dangerous driver, Gallup Poll shows two thirds of population has been criminalized for having a drink with dinner.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry a false AIDS campaign which created a public perception that HIV causes AIDS, which is a threat to the feminist principle that "adultery is a woman's right".
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry "child support payments", even though four out of five recognize fatherlessness as the worst crisis of the decade, and 40% of the nation's children are fatherless because it subsidized the removal of their fathers from their lives.
The United States Supreme Court forces upon the citizenry legalized homosexual relations even though less than half believe homosexual relations should be legalized and it trivializes the concept and purpose of "marriage".
The United States Supreme Court denies the citizenry their right to live as Christians even though this nation was founded as a Christian nation and 85% of North Americans are Christians.

Read "The Case For Father Custody", by Dr. Daniel Amneus, now on-line at cfc.htm

"Equal Protection" Applied to Women But Not Men in 1971.
Men Pay 115% of Federal Taxes.
The "Gender Gap".
Twenty One Indicators of Systemic Discrimination Against Men.
Anti-Male Bias & Loss of Productivity.
It Takes 14 Male Employees to Compensate for the Negative Productivity of One Female Employee.
Twenty Nine Phenomenal Federal Flops.
Creation of a Totalitarian State.
The "new world order".
Email the Fathers' Manifestosm
Become a Signatory to the FATHERS' MANIFESTOsm