|
|
jews did 911BREAKING, Sept 1, 2007: Two thirds blame Bush for 911!! update: in 3 weeks, between Sept. 1 and Sept. 22, the percent who blame jews and not Arabs increased from 69% to 72% as 12,401 more people took the poll This means that by September 22 more than 91% blamed jews and less than 9% blamed Arabs See calculations here!
Status above as of Sept. 22, 2007
911: God's Warning Shot For New York Brought to you by Israeli Terrorism
JEWS KNEW ABOUT 911 NINE YEARS BEFORE IT HAPPENED
In a JTF television program which aired in Manhattan on Sunday, September 11, 1994 - precisely seven years to the day before the horrendous Muslim Nazi attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon - Chaim Ben Pesach explicitly predicted that the Islamic terrorists who bombed the Twin Towers in 1993 would return to finish their bloody work, mercilessly murdering thousands of Americans. The same JTF program aired in Queens on Tuesday, September 13, 1994, precisely one year after the evil White House handshaking ceremony between Bill Clinton, Yitzchak Rabin and Yasser Arafat. Revelations 18:15-23 The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing, And saying, Alas, alas that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls! For in one hour so great riches is come to naught. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off, And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city! And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate. Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her. And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all. And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, shall be heard no more at all in thee; and no craftsman, of whatsoever craft he be, shall be found any more in thee; and the sound of a millstone shall be heard no more at all in thee; And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
Ed Ward, MD" edward19@cox.
Did New York heed this warning shot? No:
This is the last hurrah for Yankees.
There have been many excellent exposes of the LIES surrounding 911 and the impossibility that the world's most sophisticated, most expensive air defense system could have been so easily thwarted by bungling Muslims who were so inept that they left their Koran sitting on the seat of a rental car during their last hurrah. It seems, though, that none of them made the obvious connection that only one person in the entire world could have ordered a stand-down of the jet fighters whose routine protocol required them to intercept [not shoot down, but merely oberve] each of the four commercial jets involved in 911, was not Vladimir Putin nor Ariel Sharon nor Saddam Hussein nor Osama bin Ladin. Without this stand-down order, any one of a series of violations by each of these four commercial jets over the course of forty five minutes would have triggered at least 100 intercept orders. Had only one Air Force pilot been able to observe the cockpit of only one of these four commercial jets, we would have had vital information which would have prevented a single jet "bomb" from reaching its target. Without that easily available information, three out of four jets did reach their target and we know almost none of the truth about the fourth one, making 911 an immense success--for the US Presidency: Terrorism is a boon to the US Presidency http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr011211.asp
The Phoney War On Terrorism
By Ted Gunderson
Attorneys who work for the U.S. Department of Justice wrote proposed anti-terrorism legislation during the George Bush. Sr. administration in the mid 1980s. One of the authors, a female attorney, publicly stated that people would have to be killed before Congress would pass it. On February 26, 1993, a car bomb destroyed portions of the World Trade Center in N.Y.C., the F.B.I. not only knew in advance of the bombing, they furnished the ingredients for the bomb (New York Times, October 28, 1993). Not enough deaths resulted, however, to arouse the ire of Congress and pass the anti-terrorism legislation. On April 19, 1995, the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma was bombed by Timothy McVeigh, who reportedly used a fertilizer car bomb, however, an inside investigator told me that besides McVeigh, there were at least eleven others involved with the bombing, including Middle Easterners. This bombing killed 168 people, possibly 169. One year later, anti-terrorism legislation was passed that took away many of our Constitutional rights and civil liberties, such as indiscriminate wire taps, and in some instances an individual does not face his accuser in court. On September 11, 2001, two planes flew into the World Trade Center towers in New York City. I have witnesses who saw and heard systematic, simultaneous explosions on the top floors of the World Trade Center towers before they collapsed. The country is into an uproar. Citizens are demanding protection. As a result more stringent anti-terrorism measures will be passed. The president is attempting to establish a new, gigantic U.S. Government agency, Homeland Security, that would oversee programs, such as having one in every twenty-four Americans act as a "snitch" (shades of Nazi Germany in 1933), and allow U.S. military personnel to enforce laws against the civilian population, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. The anti-terrorism legislation is written under the guise of protecting us, however the real purpose of this legislation is to strip us of our rights. On May 1, 1776 (a Communist holiday), after having been commissioned to devise a plan to control the wealth, natural resources and manpower of the entire world, Adam Weishaupt, a Jesuit who had defected from Christianity, announced on behalf of the Illuminati, the twenty-five goals for achieving this plan. The goals included the corruption of the youth through sex and drugs, and control of the press (See the U.S. Congressional Record February 9, 1917, page 2947, where Congressman Calloway announced that the J.P. Morgan interests bought 25 of America's leading newspapers, and inserted their own editors, in order to control the media). Another "telling" goal - one applicable to our recent terrorist attacks, is to create a preconceived "reign of terror, and then make ourselves appear as the saviors of the oppressed, and champions of the workers", to quote Adam Wieshaupt, who then added, "And we are interested in just the opposite". (85% of these goals have been completed) A U.S. Army Special Forces officer recently told me that the U.S. Government is operating a "huge" terrorist training camp in Greece. A reliable source has advised that Osama Bin Laden met with CIA representatives from July 4 through July 14, 2001 in the city of Dubai (member of the United Arab group). The CIA representatives returned to the United States on July 15, 2001. The common denominator in all of the above-mentioned terrorist attacks is the Middle East connection. Did our intelligence agencies know in advance of these attacks? I think so. Should our intelligence agencies have known in advance of these attacks, even if they were not implicated? Yes. Did our intelligence agencies directly or indirectly participate in these terrorist attacks? I suspect so. Did these terrorist attacks occur in order to take away many of our civil liberties and Constitutional rights, in an effort to more effectively control the population, looking toward the Illuminati takeover of our country and the world? I believe so. But, don't take my word for this: Research it for yourself. Refer to http://educate-yourself.org, or write to me for the information that I have obtained from my 23 years of research. Ted Gunderson, Retired FBI Senior Special Agent In Charge (Memphis, Dallas and Los Angeles Divisions) P.O. Box 18000-259, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114 (310) 364-2281
Reaction in Beirut From: semperfidave@juno.com WORLD TRADE CENTER ATTACK - UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Ever think or say "Gee, I wish I?Td said that," or "written that?" We all have. Tonight I bring you an analysis I wish I had written. My friend, Larry Maxwell, wrote it. Larry is better at deductive reasoning than anyone I have ever known. He has a keen, analytical mind and takes nothing for granted. Like Sergeant Joe Friday, he?Ts interested only in "the facts, ma?T am, just the facts." Larry and I have discussed the WTC matter back and forth by email. I have no access to television, so my exposure to WTC reporting has been limited to the printed word and the radio. Larry has followed the case, from its first moment, observing the reporting from all directions. After we had disagreed on a couple of particulars, I asked him outright, "What?Ts your ?Ttake?T on the subject?" His response, sent personally to me, follows. I was so impressed with it that I quickly asked if I could "go public" with it and he gave his permission. To protect his work, he has copyrighted it. Larry doesn't want to deal with an avalanche of email, so he's not releasing his email address. When I finish sending this, I shall take about four days off to catch up some things that are seriously pressing me. If anyone feels compelled to respond to me, just expect that it will be a while before I can reply. I recently parodied the President?Ts speech and it attracted more than 200 responses and I still have more than 20 of them to answer. So, please, just be patient. Here is Larry?Ts "take:" Four planes that were supposed to go to particular destinations did not go to those destinations. Three of the planes hit buildings. One of them crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. No ones knows what happened because EIGHT (8) indestructible black boxes (2 on each flight) were destroyed or reportedly damaged beyond possible restoration. Guess that is why they are referred to as indestructible. The crash in Pennsylvania did not even cause an explosion. Even if it had, the boxes are designed to withstand twice the maximum heat that can be generated by a jet fuel fire. Why didn't they show us the destroyed boxes? Do you think the guys who actually found them would talk to anyone? Or are they still alive to discuss what THEY saw with their own eyes? Paper passports of two (2) of the alleged hijackers survived just fine and were supposedly found in the burning ruble of the Pentagon crash, and another three blocks from the WTC.......three blocks. I would bet good money to anyone who thinks he could contrive a way to launch a passport a distance of three city blocks. We have been told that seven cell phone calls were made from the planes. Not ONE of the callers described the hijackers as Arabic, Saudi, Muslin, Iranian or anyone from the Middle East. Barbara Olson, writer, author, investigative reporter, famous commentator, attorney, and wife of the Solicitor General of the United States (Mr. Olson being George W?Ts lawyer who argued before the Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore), did not describe the hijackers to him as being from the middle east. She was trained to be observant and mentally record details, yet there has been no report that she described the hijackers at all. Are we to believe she didn?Tt describe them, or did she describe them and we just aren?Tt being told? And if we aren?Tt being told, is it because her description doesn?Tt match the profile being fed to us? And are we to believe the Solicitor General forgot to ask her to DESCRIBE the criminals? I guess we are to accept that this is obviously an insignificant "fact" that the most high-powered-lawyer in the United States would understandably forget to ask. From almost the moment it happened it was dubbed an ATTACK ON AMERICA. I have videotape referring to it in that manner BEFORE George W made his speech in the Florida elementary school and went prancing across the country. It has NEVER been referred to as an Attack on the United States. In everything the federal government does from a legal perspective - writing and executing laws, prosecution -- everything is the based on an entity known as the United States. But on September 11, 2001 and every day since, the criminal acts were an Attack on America. Why are we suddenly America, not the United States? The Pentagon is NOT in the District of Columbia -- it is in Virginia. That is a FACT and it would take volumes to explain its significance. I will give you a hint. D.C. is the United States. Virginia and New York are American States. I am doing some research to find out, but I do not believe that the soil under the Pentagon was ever ceded by Virgina to the United States. I know for CERTAIN that the Arlington National Cemetery has NOT been ceded because a federal prosecution for larceny in the Cemetery was dismissed a few decades back by a federal district court because the federal government has no territorial jurisdiction (United States v. Penn, 48 F. 669 (E.D.Va., 1880). The State of Virgina prosecuted the felony. That area was first ceded to the federal government for the seat of government in 1791 along with land on the east side of the Potomac ceded by Maryland for the same purpose. Collectively the 10-mile-square was to be the seat of government as specified in 1.8.17 of the federal constitution. Thomas Jefferson and the Virginia Legislature took it back (22 square miles) after Jefferson and Washington had a serious rift over civil rights issues in 1792 (making Virginians license carriages and wagons and carry identification on their person). The place where the Pentagon and the Cemetery are situated was the General Robert E. Lee Plantation and Estate. It was sold to the federal government after the Civil War. Had the planes hit a military installation that had been ceded (federal territory) or anything in DC (78 square miles of federal territory ceded by Maryland under 1.8.17 of the federal constitution in 1791) it would immediately be considered and ACT OF WAR, not terrorism. Pearl Harbor was a military base. Hawaii was federal territory. That ATTACK was an ACT OF WAR. In this instance none of the planes hit anything in federal territory. The soil was American soil of two of the States which united to form the United States of America and to create the military government known as the United States that would protect America. Hence, Attack on America. BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms) agents have been walking around all over the ruble for two weeks. Why? More defense systems were disabled than can even be listed. And the media are NOT talking about THAT. When OKC was bombed, all we heard for more than a week was Osama Bin Laden, Osama Bin Laden. Then they pinned it on a guy that they said was driving a Ryder rental truck. They arrested McVeigh, according to news reports, 2 hours after the bombing, driving south on Interstate 45 toward Dallas......barefoot, no shirt, plates expired, no driver license, speeding, with a loaded .45 caliber automatic on the front seat. Just exactly what you would expect from someone who had just blown up an 8 story building with a fertilizer bomb. From that moment on, they called OKC a terrorist act. Without McVeigh they had no terrorist. We still, to this day, do not know what McVeigh was supposedly trying to influence the civilian population to do, or how he was supposedly trying to influence government policy.... By definition this was NOT a terrorist act (attached as PDF file). But the media spin is NOT based on FACT or LAW. See Attachment: PDF of definition of ACT OF TERRORISM from Black's Law Dictionary, Abridged 6th Edition -- adopted word for word by Congress codified at 18 USC § 3077. (You will need Acrobat Reader to download and read Black's Law Dictionary's legal definition of "terrorism." If you cannot download it, email Widowmaker and he will send it to you in email form). Do you really think that a few 120 pound middle-easterners overtook eight pilots, and their crew members and passengers, using razor-blade boxcutters? Do you really think a commercial pilot would give up his plane under threat from ANYONE with a boxcutter? How many hijackings have you ever heard of where the hijackers brought their own pilot? And four times in one day? And if you were going to do this deed, wouldn't you have a driver?Ts license in your own name, get your pilot's license in your own name, and leave your calling card everywhere you went, being rude and obnoxious so everyone would notice you? Explain to me how all of the defense systems were disabled? How did four planes, that were not on their computerized flight paths, fly around for more than an hour and a half without alarms going off all over the place? When their altitudes and positions CEASED TO BE VISIBLE ON RADAR, why weren't people (air traffic controllers) alarmed? As close as Boston and Dulles are to D.C., why would disappearing planes NOT be a cause for alarm? Why was it more than an hour AFTER the WTC crashes that fighters were scrambled? Was the Air Force sleeping at 7:45 AM on a Tuesday morning when the planes were supposedly hijacked, and deviated from their designated flight paths? Are we supposed to believe that when a transponder is turned OFF that no one is alerted that the plane is no longer being tracked by altitude; and that such a thing could occur to four planes almost simultaneously in the same geographical region, dangerously close to the seat of government, and NO ONE was alerting the media, the defense department, or anyone? Am I supposed to believe that no one even had a clue for an hour and a half from the time the first plane left its flight plan until smoke started coming out of a WTC tower? And when the first plane hit the tower, no one knew that three other planes were missing, and thought it prudent to call the media or government officials and tell them that three other planes were missing and that other locations might not be safe? I have talked to three pilots who have told me in their own words and understandings that what we are being told happened, could NOT possibly have happened. What I DO KNOW is that we are not hearing much TRUTH. And 110 story buildings do NOT collapse because a plane hits them. The second plane nearly missed the building, only going through the corner. Most of the fuel burned in an outside explosion. It collasped first, long before the tower that the plane completely entered. The refined Kerosene (a/k/a jet fuel) burned up fairly quickly. The stuff burning from that point on was desks, paper, plastics, carpet, etc. That fuel did not generate 2000-degree heat that would compromise 6 tubular steel columns in the center of the building designed SPECIFICALLY to keep the building from collapsing if hit by a Boeing 707 that, because it was older and less efficient, carried MORE fuel that the 757 and 767 that hit the towers. The structural engineer who designed the WTC Towers explained how the towers were designed to withstand a hit by a commercial jet -- and he did explain this to an international coalition on Terrorism in Frankfurt, Germany on Wednesday before the event. And 53 minutes after Tower 2 was hit the tower just imploded because it was on fire? Yeah right! I discussed this with a structural engineer who investigated a HOTEL in Los Angeles that he said was 30 stories and it burned from the ground floor up. It burned for nearly a week. The fire totally destroyed everything on all 30 floors. The estimated temperatures were 2200 degrees because of the natural gas and other fuel that was the catalyst for the fire. The concrete and infrastructure did not budge. It cost more than a million dollars to TEAR IT DOWN. The 30 floors above the first floor did NOT cave in on the first floor when the support structure go hot. And he reviewed the architecture on the WTC and said the type of steel and the type of construction for the WTC was double the strength of the LA hotel. Just like in OKC, people reported hearing multiple EXPLOSIONS before the WTC collapsed. I have video of people who were interviewed after the collapses and they said they heard a series of explosions (not floors collapsing) and then the buildings came down. The media dismissed it as exploding main gas lines. Gas mains on the 104th floor? Yeah right! We know that there would NOT be any safety mechanism in place that would have shut off gas flow throughout the buildings in the case of fire -- 53 minutes after a plane hit the building. Guess it was a big gas valve and it could not be vented to the outside air after it was shut off. If that is true, I have better safety measures in my own house than the WTC had. And why would they need safety mechanisms in place? It isn?Tt like anyone has ever tried to blow up those same two towers before. The strength of the WTC towers was in the 6 Tubular Steel Columns in the CENTER of the buildings, not the steel structure on the outside like most construction. The buildings were literally, according to the builder, designed NOT to pancake in the event of a Boeing 707 crashing into them. But they collapsed. It took 53 minutes for Tower 2 and 88 minutes for Tower 1 -- to simply COLLAPSE. Excerpts of his speech in Germany were posted to the internet five days before the planes hit the towers. My take? Americans are not very bright. Americans don't think. They accept what they are told. They don't TEST what they are told. They are lazy, and naive to the point of being undeserving of liberty. And for that reason they will sacrifice liberty for what they perceive to be security. That is exactly, in fact, the genesis for the federal government. The States gave up their RIGHTS in exchange for perceived security. And as long as the talking-heads can convince the general public that the federal government can PROTECT THEM, the sheople will patriotically give up every right they have if it makes them feel safe -- while singing GOD BLESS AMERICA. Copyright October 2001 Lawrence Stephen Maxwell Permission granted to reproduce and distribute After a few days, when I have time, I will add some comments of my own to Larry's presentation above. Meanwhile, I commend it to you.......search, and seek your own answers.
From: "Christian Party" <tcffc2000@yahoo.com To: "David K. Schumann" <eschuman@pacbell.net; "Repeal19th" <repeal19th@topica.com; <WhiteChristianPatriot@egroups.com; "Wille Martin" <texan13@earthlink.net; <theseries@yahoogroups.com; "The Grip" <kirk1@jps.net; <repeal19th@yahoogroups.com; <ChristSword@egroups.com; <ChristianPatriot@yahoogroups.com; <christianidentity@egroups.com; "Christian_Nationalist" <Christian_Nationalist@yahoogroups.com; "Christian Patriot" <ChristianPatriot@egroups.com; "ameripat" <ameripat@yahoogroups.com; "1-patriotpoint" <1-patriotpoint@yahoogroups.com; <CINDS@egroups.com; "demand" <demand@egroups.com; "m.o.m. email alert list" <mom-l@montana.com; <militia@montana.com; <repeal19th@egroups.com; <thegrip@egroups.com Cc: "[slick-d]" <slick-d@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:55 PM Subject: Re: Who is lying ----- Original Message -----
"Attack on America," Fox news. "Attack on civilization," Colon Powell. "Attack on democracy," Carter. "Attack on freedom," Bush. To this stupidity I scream, Hell no! Not just NO but hell no! It was an attack on the Jew capital of the world, an attack on Tel Aviv West. They did not attack Harlem, nor Little Havana, nor White racist in Idaho, they went after those who have, for fifty years, slaughtered Palestinian children. You can not murder peoples’ children with impunity. You can not perpetrate a continuous Holocaust without recriminations. If we, or the Israelis, had done this to others it would have been a "surgical strike" followed by a well-thought-out letter of limited regret. Our generals would have laughed and bragged about the timing, accuracy and bravery of the troops. And the Jew fascists of New York would, again, have danced a frenzied hora. Yes, America, cry with me for the innocent people killed in this horrid affair. But where were your tears when Manhattan Jews ran Palestinian boys into the corners of the walls of Jerusalem, and riddled their young bodies with American bullets? Where were your tears while Israelis blew the heads off the bodies of babies and committed hundreds of thousands of other unspeakable atrocities against the helpless and innocent, the powerless, old men and women? I can tell you where the Jews of New York were because I’ve written it, many times. When New York Jews went to Israel and killed innocent babies, they returned to a hero’s welcome. Please America, cut-off the goddamn Jew Television. Say no to the insane, pro-Israel, butt-wipe politicians, and listen to that small voice, somewhere in your inner-being, that has told you over and over again that what we have done regarding the bastard state of Israel and Jew war criminals is, and has always been, wrong and evil. Who did this horrible thing? I don’t know and the question of ‘who did it’ must be secondary to the cardinal question of ‘who is responsible?’ And this question I can, effortlessly, answer. First I accuse Senator Richard Shelby because I stood in his face and told him that his support of Israel was creating an extremely dangerous situation for my family and friends. Although surrounded by police, and jeered by other politicians, I told him, ten years ago, that his and this nations’ policies endangered us all. Listen America, your poltroonish politicians are, at this moment, rattling their swords, blaspheming G-d, and quoting inappropriate scriptures. And all the while, looking for those "responsible." Look in a mirror, you mamzers, look at yourselves! You killed these people just as surely as if you had flown the planes! You imbeciles, talking about "exterminating" those who are to blame and those who "support" terrorist. Supporters of terror? You brain-dead bastards, you have supported terrorists every time you voted to send Israel our money, our tanks, our helicopter gunships, rockets etc. etc. Speaking now, is that beastly little war stud, Charlie Schumer. Charlie is talking about freedom just like a whore talks about love. What a cruel joke! And now comes Hillary Clinton, wrapped in a star of David flag and talking mean. Do you really ascribe any credence to this amateurish, Yiddish, theater? Oh, but standing a head taller, above all this septic, is that fat-jawed, deluded piece of human shit, the Rebe Jerry Falwell. Did you hear what this Judeo-Christian, Christian-Zionist, idiot, son-of-a-bitch said? Did You hear him, Jesus? He said, "We should do what Ronald Reagan did to Muammar Kaddafi, kill their families." Were it not for Jerry Falwell and his asinine followers there would never have been a Twin Towers suicide attack. You don’t have a congressman or woman or prominent religious leader, who can say no, to the Jew. If one refuses, in even a slight way, to support Jew terrorists, they all know that their careers would abruptly end. These cowards, from the President on down, will continue to deny their own culpability and will, forever, sacrifice our people on a stupid, bloody, Zionist altar. Listen to them! They are talking Jewish, thinking Jewish and will soon lash-out in a very unmanly Jewish way. They are talking revenge, blood revenge. Lets go kill somebody, anybody, and their families! "We will find these people and they will suffer," said George. "We gonna hunt-down and punish those responsible." Well, George, why don’t we start with those Jew writers who, just last week, advocated exterminating or forcibly expelling all Palestinians from their homeland. Take a hard look at what you, your vice president, and Powell, Rice, Rumsfeld, etc. said when asked about the Israelis assassinating PLO leaders. You people approved of these horrors and some even said that they would do the same things here, if necessary. Extra-judiciary assassinations, here? So, look at you. You miserable accessories, accomplices, collaborators, you brought this plague to our shores. Before the fact and after the fact, you will continue to deny guilt for this disaster, and like the Jew, and like your marionette predecessors, you will never question your own responsibility, nor the insanity of your one-sided foreign policies. A few, only a precious few, thinking-people, know that we are already at war. At war with our consciences, and at war with the ignorance of those proles around us whose senses are controlled by the very ones who caused this calamity. As long as we call Israel our friend there will always be an Osama bin Laden. Two Minutes of Hate; And the proles will, again, blame whomever they are told to blame and demand the destruction of Oceania East or Oceania West because; "It was not desirable that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary." (George Orwell) Can we not stop for just one moment and ask ourselves the simple, simplest, questions - Why do people hate us so? - Is there something patently wrong with us or what our leaders are doing? We believed them when we traded liberties for security. May we never again allow our "loathing of Big Brother to change into adoration, where Big Brother seems to tower up, an invincible, fearless protector, standing like a rock against the hordes of Asia." (ditto) Israel is not worth the blood or bone of a single American. Oh God in heaven, look what it just cost us! Is this a wake-up call with the worst yet to come? God save us from our leaders and from our ignorance. James Floyd
Why they attack us. by Sam Francis Friday, September 14, 2001 "We're at war," the young waitress, her voice catching, informed me
when Well, it probably is -- except that, even as everyone from waitresses to But the blunt truth is that the United States has been at war for years Under Bill Clinton, we again launched bombing raids against civilians -- Later the same year, Mr. Clinton ordered (but later countermanded) yet In all the buckets of media gabble about the terrorist attacks in New Let us hear no more about how the "terrorists" have "declared
war on The blunt and quite ugly truth is that the United States has been at war
TO LISTEN ON REAL PLAYER --Observing the responses to last week's attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center has been interesting, to say the least. It has been 11 days now, and nearly every spokesman for the controlled media and for the government has been avoiding the obvious question: "Why was the United States attacked?" Nearly all of them are afraid of that question; they are pretending that there is no answer to that question, that there was no reason for the attack, that it was an unprovoked attack -- because the answer to the question, "Why was America attacked?" also is obvious. We were attacked because we have been letting ourselves be used to do all of Israel's dirty work in the Middle East. We were attacked because we have supported -- militarily or diplomatically or financially -- every bit of aggression and every atrocity Israel has committed against its neighbors for the past half-century. Everyone in the world with even half a brain understands that, even if talking about it is considered Politically Incorrect. I've been warning about reprisals against the United States for many years. Seven years ago, on February 25, 1994, an American Jew, Baruch Goldstein, walked into a mosque in Hebron and machine-gunned Palestinians at prayer, killing 29 of them before running out of ammunition and being beaten to death by the Palestinian survivors. This act of mass murder immediately made Goldstein a saint for religious Jews everywhere. They built a shrine to him near Hebron, and Jews from the United States and other countries still make pilgrimages to this shrine. There were no reprisals from the Palestinians at the time, and the mass media in the United States barely mentioned the massacre, even though the murderer, Goldstein, was an American. But the Palestinians -- and Muslims everywhere -- remember such things. They blame not just the Jews, but also the people who finance and arm and shelter the Jews: that is, they blame America. And right after the massacre I warned all of my fellow Americans in an article I wrote for my magazine National Vanguard. The article was titled "Stay Out of Tall Buildings," and it reported the massacre and the minimal response of the media here, and then it warned, and I quote: "New Yorkers who work in tall office buildings -- anything close to the size of the World Trade Center -- might consider wearing hardhats to work for the next few months." Well, of course, it took the Muslims more than a few months, and there were many more American provocations meanwhile. But last week the response eventually came. Of course there had been lesser responses earlier -- the bombing of a couple of American embassies in Africa and of the U.S. Navy destroyer, the USS Cole, for example -- but those events were a long way from here, and to most Americans they weren't real: hardly enough to distract them from the latest ball game on TV. What happened last week finally caught the attention of the American people. It's about time that Americans began to pay attention to such things. Unfortunately, the great majority of Americans still get all of their opinions and attitudes from TV, and so they will not learn what they should learn from last week's attacks. What they're learning from TV is that the attacks were "unprovoked," that the attackers were "cowards," and that "we'll smoke them out of their holes, by golly." They're also taking to heart a lot of slogans along the lines of: "We're the greatest country on earth, and these attacks will only unite us and help us all pull together." When real lemmings hear slogans like that they become misty-eyed, put their right hands over their hearts, and begin singing "The Star-Spangled Banner." And they begin looking for enemies, so they can demonstrate their patriotism, a sentiment which will be in fashion again for a few months. One lemming was arrested in Washington trying to ram his car into the Saudi Arabian Embassy. Others around the country have been throwing bricks through the windows of mosques. All of them have been flying American flags. But among all of them there is hardly a grain of understanding. The dimwit who tried to ram the Saudi Arabian Embassy doesn't understand that the Saudi government is more afraid of Muslim fundamentalists than anyone in the West is. If Muslim fundamentalism experiences a surge of growth as a consequence of the success of the attacks last week, it will be either the government of Saudi Arabia or that of Egypt that will fall first, followed quickly by every other Middle Eastern government that has collaborated with the Jews -- or, what is the same thing, with America. And the chests of all the dimwits swell with pride when their government in Washington rattles its sabers and issues demands to the government of Pakistan and other governments in the Middle East. Washington has demanded cooperation with its effort to catch the people who attacked New York and Washington last week. The rulers and top politicians in these countries are pledging their cooperation, for their own reasons, but this sort of thing doesn't sit well with their countrymen. Patriotic Pakistanis, both among the educated classes and among the religious elements, can only hate America even more as a result of these humiliating demands and the ignominious response of their own leaders. Of course, I don't know who organized the attacks on Washington and New York last week. Neither does Mr. Bush, and I doubt that he will know with any degree of certainty even when he begins ordering missile attacks against various Middle Eastern targets, more for proving his "leadership" to the flag-waving lemmings here than for actually punishing the people who organized the events of last week. Aside from these domestic political considerations, the principal determinant of the American response will be whatever the Jews think is best for Israel. Former Israeli prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu set the tone last week while the fire was still burning in the Pentagon and in some of the buildings of the World Trade Center complex. He said that it will not be enough to kill Osama bin Laden and his followers; the United States must destroy all of the governments of those countries where terrorist groups might arise in the future. We must do it now, Netanyahu demanded, while there is popular support among the American people for such a pre-emptive war. If you wait, Netanyahu said, you will lose your chance. New and stronger terrorist organizations will spring up to take the place of Osama bin Laden's group. So strike now! And other Jewish leaders, both in Israel and in the United States, were pushing similarly for a full-scale pre-emptive war. There's no doubt that the U.S. military forces could depopulate the entire Middle East with ease. With minimal loss to ourselves, we could make a huge, self-illuminated, glass parking lot out of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and all of the other countries bordering the Persian Gulf, the Red Sea, and the eastern Mediterranean -- except Israel, of course. Actually, that's not the solution the Jews prefer. Instead they want us to send in ground troops, whip their armies, take over their countries, and install puppet governments that will follow the Jews' orders. Then they can control and milk the whole area. That grinning idiot we have in the White House, George Bush, is perfectly willing to go along with such a scheme if that's what they tell him to do. The media are sampling public opinion now and reporting that most of the lemmings will go along too. Whether or not that is the way the Bush government goes remains to be seen. There are serious liabilities and risks if the United States undertakes such a major, protracted war. Occupation armies will be required to keep the area pacified. And even though the lemmings are feeling all warm and fuzzy and patriotic and morally indignant now in the wake of last week's attacks, they may become restless during a protracted war intended to bring the whole Middle East under Jewish hegemony, especially when our casualties begin mounting. Presumably all of these considerations will be taken into account before the Bush government is told what to do. Mr. Bush's advisers also should take into account what happened to the Soviet Union during its attempt to conquer Afghanistan. The Soviet Union spent more than eight years trying to whip Afghanistan's Muslim guerrillas and had 15,000 of its own soldiers killed in the attempt before finally giving up in 1989. And during this attempt the Soviets already had a pro-Soviet government in Kabul: a government whose leaders were condemned as traitors and infidels and butchered by the Muslims as soon as the Red Army pulled out. Any government of Afghanistan that might otherwise be inclined to make a deal with the United States certainly will remember that. Of course, just because the Soviet Union was unable to whip Afghanistan doesn't mean that the United States can't do it -- if the U.S. government is willing to make a big enough effort and to sacrifice the lives of enough Americans. We certainly have more than enough firepower, more than enough high-tech weaponry, to do the job. We are a bit short in some departments, to be sure: intelligence, for example. I am astounded that as complex an operation as that against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon last week could have been planned and carried out without the Bush government having any hint of what was going on. Was this another Pearl Harbor scenario, where our government knew of an impending attack but pretended it knew nothing and waited for the attack to come so as to have an excuse for becoming involved in a war? The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, of which the Roosevelt government had plenty of forewarning, transformed the sentiment of the American public from anti-war to pro-war overnight and allowed the Roosevelt government to become fully involved in the war against Germany, which was Japan's ally. Roosevelt was itching for a war because all the Jews around him were pushing for it. Did the Bush government know about last week's attack ahead of time but pretended not to so as to have an excuse for launching a war against the Jews' enemies in the Middle East? I really don't know. I think it much more likely that the government of Israel had some intelligence about the attack ahead of time and deliberately withheld that intelligence from the United States. That's the sort of thing the Israelis often have done in the past, and they certainly welcomed last week's attack. Well, that's a minor question. The big question is: Why should we start another war now? What advantage do we gain, even if we pulverize Afghanistan and kill its entire population? Do we thereby prevent any further attacks against America by people in the Middle East who object to our government's support of Israel? I think not. Afghanistan is not the only country in the Middle East capable of supporting guerrilla fighters, and guerrillas who are willing to sacrifice their own lives by flying into their targets will not be easily intimidated. We may be able to install puppet governments and occupation armies to support those governments everywhere in the Middle East, and we may be able to introduce all sorts of new security programs in the United States intended to make the job of an attacker more difficult, but the ultimate cost of all this will be very, very high. And again, the question is, why should we do these things? Why should we continue making ourselves a target for terrorists so that these things even bear consideration? You know, there are Americans who have a chip-on-the-shoulder attitude. They don't want to hear that we should stop letting Israel wag America like its tail. They don't want to hear that we should stop doing the things in the Middle East that make the people of the Middle East retaliate against us. Their attitude is, "By God, nobody's going to tell us what to do. We'll continue supporting Israel with money, weapons, and diplomacy if we want to, whether it's in America's interests or not, and if any of those towel-heads in the Middle East don't like it we'll kick their asses. We're bigger and tougher than anybody else, and we'll push anybody around we want to, and they'd better not complain about it." This swaggering, bully-boy attitude is what we're hearing from some American politicians now who're courting Jewish support -- and also from some military leaders with political ambitions, unfortunately. I think that's really stupid. Let's let the attacks on New York and Washington last week serve as a wake-up call for every thinking American: a wake-up call for us to begin paying attention to our government's policies and to begin insisting that our government act only to protect and promote the interests of the American people, and nothing else. For far too long we have watched cynically from the sidelines as our government became more and more corrupt, more and more irresponsible, more and more negligent of America's interests. We watched the Jews corrupt our political system with their money and their media and then use America's power and wealth for their own purposes. Most Americans, because of the Jewish control of their mass media, are not aware of this, but thinking people in most of the rest of the world certainly are aware of the way we're being used. This has earned America the contempt of the whole world, including not only Israel's enemies, but Israel itself. The deliberate Israeli attempt to sink our ship the USS Liberty in 1967 was just one indicator of that contempt, which has grown more profound since. You know, there are two reasons why the people of the Middle East hate America. One reason is that to the Muslims America is the Great Satan, the corrupter of the world. They don't want us meddling in their affairs and trying to change the ideas and attitudes of their people. They don't want our Hollywood films and our Madison Avenue fashions and our immorality and our lust for money to corrupt their people. They don't want to be contaminated by us. They want us to take all of our Jewish fashions and our Jewish television and our Jewish attitudes and ideas and get out of their lives, go home, leave them alone. For many Muslims the view of America as the Great Satan, the great corrupter, as an actual source of corruption in the Middle East, is enough reason to attack us. But if we were not meddling in their affairs, if we were not supporting puppet governments in their part of the world, if we were not supporting Israel, if we were not bringing our corruption to them, if we would in fact go home and leave them alone, their contempt for our lack of character and morality would not be a sufficient motive for them to attack us over here. The reason for their attack last week is our support for Israel's aggression against them. Our lying media and our lying politicians in Washington will deny that, but it is crystal clear to anyone with eyes to see; it is obvious to thinking people everywhere. The attack last week was not "unprovoked." We were attacked because we support Israel financially, diplomatically, and militarily. As long as we continue to support Israel we will remain a target for the patriots and the religious fundamentalists of every other country in the Middle East. Is that really what we want to do? Does that really serve America's interests? I think not. Let's emphasize just two things in connection with last week's attack. First, anybody in the media or in the government, any politician or other public figure, who tells us that the attack was "unprovoked" is lying to us: consciously and deliberately lying, because although the lemmings may not know any better, every government official and every media boss does know better. And anyone who deliberately lies to the American people on such an important matter is thereby declaring himself an enemy of America, an enemy of the American people, whether the liar is George Bush or a top media Jew or a general in the Pentagon. Anyone who tries to steer us away from the truth that this attack was a retaliation for the American support of Israel's atrocious behavior in the Middle East is an enemy of America. Second, when we hear media spokesmen or government spokesmen tell us sternly, their voices quivering with phony indignation, that we need to hunt down and punish the evil men responsible for last week's attack, we can only agree with them. Yes, the people responsible for the attack are evil and should be hunted down and punished. But we don't have to go to the Middle East to find the responsible people and punish them. They're a lot closer than the Middle East. They're evil, but not because a lot of Jewish real estate in New York was destroyed; yes, that's right, the owner of the World Trade Center -- that is, the owner of a 99-year lease on the property -- is a Jew, Larry Silverstein. They're evil, but not because a great many Jewish lawyers and Jewish financial consultants and Jewish middlemen had offices in the World Trade Center. They're evil because thousands of young White women who worked as receptionists and secretaries and file clerks in both the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were killed, along with hundreds of airline passengers and crew members. That is what calls for punishment. And who are the evil men who should be punished, these men responsible for the death of so many of our people? Mr. Bush assures us that he's got the FBI and the CIA on their tails, and that he'll find them pretty soon. Hey! Mr. Bush! Call off the FBI and the CIA. If you want to know who's responsible, just walk into your bathroom and look in the mirror. Of course, it's not really fair to put all of the blame on Mr. Bush. His last ten or so predecessors in the White House also are responsible. Republican and Democrat alike, they've all danced to whatever tune Israel was playing. By ignoring America's interests and letting themselves be used by Israel against Israel's neighbors for the past half century, they all helped to incur the debt that was only partly repaid last week. And indeed, we can cast the net of blame much wider. We have a system of government in the United States that the Jews have learned to manipulate. With their money and their media they are able to swing elections, buy politicians, and control public policy to suit themselves, without regard for the interests of the American people. After the Second World War they were determined to change American immigration policy in a way that would dilute the White majority with a flood of non-White immigrants, and they found a multitude of White politicians and White clerics and White businessmen willing to collaborate with them and push through the immigration changes they wanted. And when the Jews launched the so-called "civil rights" revolution in the 1960s, again they found many thousands of White politicians and clerics and businessmen and lawyers to help them strike down the laws against miscegenation and push through new legislation requiring the racial integration of schools and workplaces and neighborhoods. And the same pattern can be seen in the entire history of America's policy in the Middle East. From the beginning it has been a policy intended to promote Jewish interests and to sacrifice American interests, but the Jews could not have pushed these policies through by themselves. They had a multitude of Gentile collaborators willing to sacrifice the interests of the American people in order to curry favor with the Jews. And these people, these traitors to their country and to their race, who put their own selfish interests above those of their people, certainly have been aware all along of the debt that was being built up. Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Six Pack may not have figured out why everyone in the Muslim world hates America's guts and why a few Muslims are willing to die in order to punish America for what America has done to them on behalf of Israel, but the traitors understand it perfectly well. They understand who is responsible for last week's tragedy, and that's why they all try to keep the public confused by always referring to last week's attack as "unprovoked." And I'll guarantee you this: America will continue to have tragedy after tragedy, not because we don't have strict enough security measures at our airports, and not because of Osama bin Laden, but because we don't have a government which represents the interests of the American people. Until we regain control of our own news and entertainment media and have leaders whose sole concern is what's good for America -- not what will win them Jewish support in the next election -- we'll remain a nation adrift, hated by all, respected by none, and fair game for anyone who has a grievance against us.
Mr. Speaker: |
